ArticleBMJ open2020
HIP (HPA-screening in pregnancy) study: protocol of a nationwide, prospective and observational study to assess incidence and natural history of fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and identifying pregnancies at risk.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04067375 (Towards Routine HPA-screening in Pregnancy to Prevent FNAIT), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Towards Routine HPA-screening in Pregnancy to Prevent FNAIT: Assessing Disease Burden and Optimising Risk Group Selection
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Ethics of Clinical Research on Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn: Balancing Benefit-Risk, Autonomy, and Maternal-Fetal Interests.American journal of perinatology · 2026Review
- Altered glycosylation profile of anti-HPA-1a-specific antibodies: insights from a prospective fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia cohort.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Structure, function, and implications of fucosyltransferases in health and disease.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Screening of pregnant women for foetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: A cost-utility analysis.Vox sanguinis · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics of human platelet antigen (HPA)-1a and HPA-5b alloimmunised pregnancies and the association between platelet HPA-5b antibodies and symptomatic fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia.British journal of haematology · 2021Article
- An Unusual Case of Severe Persistent Neonatal Thrombocytopenia in an Extremely Low Birth Weight, Extreme Preterm Neonate.Global pediatric health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) may lead to severe fetal or neonatal bleeding and/or perinatal death. Maternal alloantibodies, targeted against fetal human platelet antigens (HPAs), can result thrombocytopenia and bleeding complications. In pregnancies with known immunisation, fetal bleeding can be prevented by weekly maternal intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Without population-based screening, immunisation is only detected after birth of an affected infant. Affected cases that might have been prevented, when timely identified through population-based screening. Implementation is hampered by the lack of knowledge on incidence, natural history and identification of pregnancies at high risk of bleeding. We designed a study aimed to obtain this missing knowledge. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The HIP (HPA-screening in pregnancy) study is a nationwide, prospective and observational cohort study aimed to assess incidence and natural history of FNAIT as well as identifying pregnancies at high risk for developing bleeding complications. For logistic reasons, we invite rhesus D-negative or rhesus c-negative pregnant women, who take part in the Dutch population-based prenatal screening programme for erythrocyte immunisation, to participate in our study. Serological HPA-1a typing is performed and a luminex-based multiplex assay will be performed for the detection of anti-HPA-1a antibodies. Results will not be communicated to patients or caregivers. Clinical data of HPA-1a negative women and an HPA-1a positive control group will be collected after birth. Samples of HPA-1a immunised pregnancies with and without signs of bleeding will be compared with identify parameters for identification of pregnancies at high risk for bleeding complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the Medical Ethical Committee Leiden-The Hague-Delft (P16.002). Study enrolment began in March 2017. All pregnant women have to give informed consent for testing according to the protocol. Results of the study will be disseminated through congresses and publication in relevant peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04067375.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.