Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690720›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2020

The Cyclin CYCA3;4 Is a Postprophase Target of the APC/C

Alex Willems, Jefri Heyman, Thomas Eekhout, Ignacio Achon, Jose Antonio Pedroza-Garcia, Tingting Zhu, Lei Li, Ilse Vercauteren, Hilde Van den Daele, Brigitte van de Cotte and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. SCFMolecules and cells · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. TheProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex WillemsDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7211-8388
Jefri HeymanDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3266-4189
Thomas EekhoutDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-1553
Ignacio AchonDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4553-1257
Jose Antonio Pedroza-GarciaDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-0157
Tingting ZhuDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0904-7636
Lei LiDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium lieven.deveylder@psb.vib-ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0002-1820-9852
Ilse VercauterenDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9561-8468
Hilde Van den DaeleDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4271-6694
Brigitte van de CotteDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7236-9243
Ive De SmetDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-8893
Lieven De VeylderDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent B-9052, Belgium lieven.deveylder@psb.vib-ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-4426
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) controls unidirectional progression through the cell cycle by marking key cell cycle proteins for proteasomal turnover. Its activity is temporally regulated by the docking of different activating subunits, known in plants as CELL DIVISION PROTEIN20 (CDC20) and CELL CYCLE SWITCH52 (CCS52). Despite the importance of the APC/C during cell proliferation, the number of identified targets in the plant cell cycle is limited. Here, we used the growth and meristem phenotypes of Arabidopsis (

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell DifferentiationCell DivisionEthyl MethanesulfonateGene Expression Regulation, PlantMeristemMutationPhosphorylationPlant CellsPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlant StemsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideArabidopsis ProteinsCCS52A2 protein, ArabidopsisCell Cycle ProteinsEthyl MethanesulfonateRBR1 protein, Arabidopsis

Identifiers

PMID32690720
PMCPMC7474283
OpenAlexW3044812815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.