Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690692›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Nanoparticles presenting clusters of CD4 expose a universal vulnerability of HIV-1 by mimicking target cells.

Magnus A G Hoffmann, Yotam Bar-On, Zhi Yang, Harry B Gristick, Priyanthi N P Gnanapragasam, Jost Vielmetter, Michel C Nussenzweig, Pamela J Bjorkman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Engineering pan-HIV-1 neutralization potency through multispecific antibody avidity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magnus A G HoffmannDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0003-4923-9568
Yotam Bar-OnLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-707X
Zhi YangDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0001-8680-3784
Harry B GristickDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-1957-2821
Priyanthi N P GnanapragasamDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Jost VielmetterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-4314-7163
Michel C NussenzweigLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Pamela J BjorkmanDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; bjorkman@caltech.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2277-3990
California Institute of Technology · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD4-based decoy approaches against HIV-1 are attractive options for long-term viral control, but initial designs, including soluble CD4 (sCD4) and CD4-Ig, were ineffective. To evaluate a therapeutic that more accurately mimics HIV-1 target cells compared with monomeric sCD4 and dimeric CD4-Ig, we generated virus-like nanoparticles that present clusters of membrane-associated CD4 (CD4-VLPs) to permit high-avidity binding of trimeric HIV-1 envelope spikes. In neutralization assays, CD4-VLPs were >12,000-fold more potent than sCD4 and CD4-Ig and >100-fold more potent than the broadly neutralizing antibody (bNAb) 3BNC117, with >12,000-fold improvements against strains poorly neutralized by 3BNC117. CD4-VLPs also neutralized patient-derived viral isolates that were resistant to 3BNC117 and other bNAbs. Intraperitoneal injections of CD4-CCR5-VLP produced only subneutralizing plasma concentrations in HIV-1-infected humanized mice but elicited CD4-binding site mutations that reduced viral fitness. All mutant viruses showed reduced sensitivity to sCD4 and CD4-Ig but remained sensitive to neutralization by CD4-VLPs in vitro. In vitro evolution studies demonstrated that CD4-VLPs effectively controlled HIV-1 replication at neutralizing concentrations, and viral escape was not observed. Moreover, CD4-VLPs potently neutralized viral swarms that were completely resistant to CD4-Ig, suggesting that escape pathways that confer resistance against conventional CD4-based inhibitors are ineffective against CD4-VLPs. These findings suggest that therapeutics that mimic HIV-1 target cells could prevent viral escape by exposing a universal vulnerability of HIV-1: the requirement to bind CD4 on a target cell. We propose that therapeutic and delivery strategies that ensure durable bioavailability need to be developed to translate this concept into a clinically feasible functional cure therapy.

Indexed as

CD4 AntigensHIV-1NanoparticlesVirionAnti-HIV AgentsCell LineHumansMolecular MimicryNanomedicineAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Antigensdecoy therapeuticsfunctional cureHIV-1virus-like particles

Identifiers

PMID32690692
PMCPMC7414181
OpenAlexW3044286538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.