Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690618›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Structural Controllability Predicts Functional Patterns and Brain Stimulation Benefits Associated with Working Memory.

Lysianne Beynel, Lifu Deng, Courtney A Crowell, Moritz Dannhauer, Hannah Palmer, Susan Hilbig, Angel V Peterchev, Bruce Luber, Sarah H Lisanby, Roberto Cabeza and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Control of cortical population activity with patterned microstimulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Low-dimensional controllability of brain networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lysianne BeynelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Lifu DengCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Courtney A CrowellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Moritz DannhauerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Hannah PalmerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Susan HilbigDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Angel V PeterchevDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Bruce LuberNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20852.
Sarah H LisanbyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Roberto CabezaCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Lawrence G AppelbaumDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Simon W DavisDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27704 simon.davis@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-0756
Duke University · USNational Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Non-invasive Neuromodulation Unit (NNU)ZIAMH002955 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2016 to 2025
$40.3M
Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adults - Administrative SupplementU01AG050618 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI APPELBAUM, LAWRENCE G., CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Bilateral Brain Dynamics Supporting Cognition in Normal Aging and DementiaK01AG053539 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, SIMON W · 2017 to 2021
$518k
Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adultsR01AG050618 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI APPELBAUM, LAWRENCE G., CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2015 to 2015
$497k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG053539NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050618NIA NIH HHS U01 AG050618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain is an inherently dynamic system, and much work has focused on the ability to modify neural activity through both local perturbations and changes in the function of global network ensembles. Network controllability is a recent concept in network neuroscience that purports to predict the influence of individual cortical sites on global network states and state changes, thereby creating a unifying account of local influences on global brain dynamics. While this notion is accepted in engineering science, it is subject to ongoing debates in neuroscience as empirical evidence linking network controllability to brain activity and human behavior remains scarce. Here, we present an integrated set of multimodal brain-behavior relationships derived from fMRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied during an individually calibrated working memory task performed by individuals of both sexes. The modes describing the structural network system dynamics showed direct relationships to brain activity associated with task difficulty, with difficult-to-reach modes contributing to functional brain states in the hard task condition. Modal controllability (a measure quantifying the contribution of difficult-to-reach modes) at the stimulated site predicted both fMRI activations associated with increasing task difficulty and rTMS benefits on task performance. Furthermore, fMRI explained 64% of the variance between modal controllability and the working memory benefit associated with 5 Hz online rTMS. These results therefore provide evidence toward the functional validity of network control theory, and outline a clear technique for integrating structural network topology and functional activity to predict the influence of stimulation on subsequent behavior.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMemory, Short-TermAdultBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationcontrollabilitynetwork control theorynetworksTMSworking memory

Identifiers

PMID32690618
PMCPMC7455213
OpenAlexW3043910771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.