Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690617›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Statistical Learning and Inference Is Impaired in the Nonclinical Continuum of Psychosis.

Ilvana Dzafic, Roshini Randeniya, Clare D Harris, Moritz Bammel, Marta I Garrido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive Dysfunction as a Risk Factor for Psychosis.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilvana DzaficMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia ilvana.dzafic@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1101-0736
Roshini RandeniyaQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-750X
Clare D HarrisQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Queensland, Australia.
Moritz BammelInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrueck, 49074 Osnabrueck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0321-2864
Marta I GarridoMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0679-4959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our perceptions result from the brain's ability to make inferences, or predictive models, of sensory information. Recently, it has been proposed that psychotic traits may be linked to impaired predictive processes. Here, we examine the brain dynamics underlying statistical learning and inference in stable and volatile environments, in a population of healthy human individuals (

Indexed as

Decision MakingLearningAdultBrainEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePerceptionPsychotic Disordersinferenceprediction errorpsychosis continuumstatistical learningvolatility

Identifiers

PMID32690617
PMCPMC7455217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.