Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690506›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

'Our culture prohibits some things': qualitative inquiry into how sociocultural context influences the scale-up of community-based injectable contraceptives in Nigeria.

Oluwaseun Oladapo Akinyemi, Bronwyn Harris, Mary Kawonga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The world of contraception: A global mapping project across FIGO member societies.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Oluwaseun Oladapo AkinyemiHealth Policy and Management, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria ooakinyemi@comui.edu.ng.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-1459
Bronwyn HarrisDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Mary KawongaSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg-Braamfontein, Gauteng, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore how sociocultural factors may support or impede the adoption of community-based distribution of injectable contraceptives in Nigeria.

designA qualitative study based on inductive thematic analysis was conducted through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions.

settingMost participants lived in Gombe State, North-East Nigeria. Other participants were from Ibadan (South-West) and Abuja (Federal Capital Territory).

participantsThrough seven key informant interviews, 15 in-depth interviews and 10 focus group discussions, 102 participants were involved in the study.

methodsThis study conducted in 2016 was part of a larger study on scale-up of community-based distribution of injectable contraceptives. Qualitative data were collected from traditional and religious leaders, health workers and community members. The data were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework method.

resultsSociocultural challenges to scale-up included patriarchy and men's fear of losing control over their spouses, traditional and religious beliefs about fertility, and myths about contraceptives and family planning. As a result of deep-rooted beliefs that children are 'divine blessings' and that procreation should not be regulated, participants described a subtle resistance to uptake of injectable contraceptives. Since Gombe is largely a patriarchal society, male involvement emerged as important to the success of meaningful innovation uptake. Community leaders largely described their participation in the scale-up process as active, although they also identified the scope for further involvement and recognition.

conclusionScale-up is more than setting up health sector implementing structures, training health workers and getting innovation supplies, but also requires preparedness which includes paying attention to complex contextual issues. Policy implementers should also see scale-up as a learning process and be willing to move at the speed of the community.

Indexed as

CultureFamily Planning ServicesAdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInjectionsMaleMenMiddle AgedNigeriaQualitative ResearchReligionContraceptive Agents, Femalehealth policyhealth services administration & managementpreventive medicinepublic healthqualitative researchreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID32690506
PMCPMC7371132
OpenAlexW3045170116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.