Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690496›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Development of a core outcome set for studies on prevention and management of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism (COSPVenTE): a study protocol.

Alexandria King, Rohan D'Souza, Lizabeth Teshler, Nadine Shehata, Ann K Malinowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandria KingObstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rohan D'SouzaObstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-2017
Lizabeth TeshlerMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Nadine ShehataMedicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9267-6256
Ann K MalinowskiObstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Ann.Malinowski@sinaihealthsystem.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPregnancy and post partum are times of heightened risk for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which in turn is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and long-term morbidity. The current research aimed at improving health guidelines for women with pregnancy-associated VTE is limited by inconsistency in outcome reporting preventing comparison across studies, and lack of input from patients with respect to outcomes they propose are most important to measure. A suggested solution is the development of a core outcome set (COS) that defines the minimum criteria for outcome reporting in clinical trials and prospective studies. COSs function to facilitate data harmonisation and increase homogeneity in outcome reporting while incorporating the voice of women in this population in the planning of research to inform their ongoing care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The development of a COS for studies on pregnancy-associated VTE will comprise five steps. First, a systematic review of the published literature will identify currently reported outcomes, their definitions and measurements if applicable. This will be followed by in-person interviews with patients, clinicians, researchers, hospital administrators and policy-makers to identify outcomes they consider important. Third, the long list of outcomes obtained from steps I and II will be condensed through online Delphi surveys involving an international group of relevant stakeholders including patients. This will be followed by a face-to-face consensus meeting with representatives of all stakeholder groups to arrive at a consensus on the final COS. Lastly, to determine how the identified core outcomes should be measured, another literature review and Delphi process will be carried out as necessary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board (REB 18-0314-E). Study results will be published in open-access journals and presented at obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine and haematology conferences. All progress will be documented on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) and Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials databases. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019111479.

Indexed as

Consensus Statements as TopicDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularResearch DesignStakeholder ParticipationSystematic Reviews as TopicVenous Thromboembolismcore outcome setpregnancyvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID32690496
PMCPMC7371150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.