Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690203›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2020

An RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Victoria L Champion, Shannon M Christy, William Rakowski, David R Lairson, Patrick O Monahan, Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi, Timothy E Stump, Erika B Biederman, Carla D Kettler, Susan M Rawl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03279198 (Increasing Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03279198 nacompletednot on this map

Increasing Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening in Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2010 to 2017Enrolled1,196ConditionsBreast Cancer Female, Colorectal CancerArmsTIWeb, CSC, UC, TIWeb+CSC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Journal of health communication · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Victoria L ChampionDepartment of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana; Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: vchampio@iu.edu.
Shannon M ChristyDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
William RakowskiProfessor Emeritus, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
David R LairsonSchool of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Patrick O MonahanDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Wambui G Gathirua-MwangiDepartment of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Timothy E StumpDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Psychology, Purdue School of Science, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Erika B BiedermanDepartment of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Carla D KettlerDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Susan M RawlDepartment of Science of Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Funding

Training in Research for Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Control ProgramR25CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentR25CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI BRANDON, THOMAS H · 2003 to 2018
$4.0M
Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Screening Among Rural WomenR01CA196243 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE, PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Increasing Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screnning in WomenR01CA136940 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2010 to 2014
$3.0M
Research and Training for Behavioral Oncology InterventionsK05CA175048 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2014 to 2018
$484k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA175048NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136940NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196243NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090314NCI NIH HHS R25 CA117865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdherence to breast and colorectal cancer screenings reduce mortality from these cancers, yet screening rates remain suboptimal. This 2 × 2 RCT compared 3 theory-based interventions to usual care to simultaneously increase breast and colon cancer screening in women who were nonadherent to both screenings at study entry.

designRCT. SETTING/

participantsWomen (n=692) who were nonadherent to both breast and colon cancer screenings and aged 51-75 years were recruited. Enrollment, intervention delivery, and data collection were completed between 2013 and 2017, and data analyzed in 2018.

interventionThe randomized intervention included the following 4 groups: 3 intervention arms (personally tailored messages using a web-based intervention, phone delivery by a trained navigator, or both) compared with usual care. Women at an average risk for colon cancer were allowed to select either colonoscopy or stool test as their preferred colon cancer screening. Mammography was promoted for breast cancer screening.

main outcome measuresOutcome data at 6 months included self-report and medical records for screening activity.

resultsAll intervention arms significantly increased receipt of either a mammogram or stool test compared with control (web: p<0.0249, phone: p<0.0001, web + phone: p<0.0001). When considering receipt of both mammogram and stool test, all intervention arms were significantly different from usual care (web: p<0.0249, phone: p<0.0003, web + phone: p<0.0001). In addition, women who were adherent to mammography had a 4.5 times greater odds of becoming adherent to colonoscopy.

conclusionsThe tailored intervention simultaneously supporting both breast and colon cancer screenings significantly improved rates of obtaining one of the screenings and increased receipt of both tests.

trial registrationThis study is registered with the clinical trials identifier NCT03279198 at www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAgedColonoscopyFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult Blood

Identifiers

PMID32690203
PMCPMC8867905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.