Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690105›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis, people experiencing other mental health problems and for informal carers: Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) study protocol for three randomised controlled trials.

Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Rachel Elliott, Melanie Smuk, Clare Robinson, Sylvia Bailey, Roger Smith, Jeroen Keppens, Hannah Hussain, Kristian Pollock, Pim Cuijpers and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan Rennick-EgglestoneSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. stefan.egglestone@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-011X
Rachel ElliottDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Melanie SmukLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Clare RobinsonCentre for Primary Care & Public Health, Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner St, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Sylvia BaileyNEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, UK.
Roger SmithNEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, UK.
Jeroen KeppensDepartment of Informatics, King's College London, Bush House, 30 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, UK.
Hannah HussainDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Kristian PollockSchool of Health Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joy Llewellyn-BeardsleySchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Fiona NgSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Caroline YeoSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
James RoeNational Institute for Health Research, ARC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Ada HuiSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Lian van der KriekeUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University Center of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.
Rianna WalcottDepartment of Digital Humanities, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Mike SladeSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBKing's College London · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0615-20016National Institute for Health Research RP-PG-0615-20016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health recovery narratives have been defined as first-person lived experience accounts of recovery from mental health problems which refer to events or actions over a period of time and which include elements of adversity or struggle, and also self-defined strengths, successes or survival. They are readily available in invariant recorded form, including text, audio or video. Previous studies have provided evidence that receiving recorded recovery narratives can provide benefits to recipients. This protocol describes three pragmatic trials that will be conducted by the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) study using the NEON Intervention, a web application that delivers recorded recovery narratives to its users. The aim of the NEON Trial is to understand whether receiving online recorded recovery narratives through the NEON Intervention benefits people with experience of psychosis. The aim of the NEON-O and NEON-C trials is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial on the use of the NEON Intervention with people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems and those who care for others experiencing mental health problems respectively.

methodsThe NEON Trial will recruit 683 participants with experience of psychosis. The NEON-O Trial will recruit at least 100 participants with experience of non-psychosis mental health problems. The NEON-C Trial will recruit at least 100 participants with experience of caring for others who have experienced mental health problems. In all three trials, participants will be randomly allocated into one of two arms. Intervention arm participants will receive treatment as usual plus immediate access to the NEON Intervention for 1 year. Control arm participants will receive treatment as usual plus access to the NEON Intervention after 1 year. All participants will complete demographics and outcome measures at baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks and 52 weeks. For the NEON Trial, the primary outcome measure is the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life at 52 weeks, and secondary outcome measures are the CORE-10, Herth Hope Index, Mental Health Confidence Scale and Meaning in Life Questionnaire. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted using data collected through the EQ-5D-5 L and the Client Service Receipt Inventory. DISCUSSION: NEON Trial analyses will establish both effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the NEON Intervention for people with experience of psychosis, and hence inform future clinical recommendations for this population.

trial registrationAll trials were prospectively registered with ISRCTN. NEON Trial: ISRCTN11152837 . Registered on 13 August 2018. NEON-C Trial: ISRCTN76355273 . Registered on 9 January 2020. NEON-O Trial: ISRCTN63197153 . Registered on 9 January 2020.

Indexed as

CaregiversMental Health RecoveryNarrationPsychotic DisordersQuality of LifeHumansMental HealthPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCarersMANSAMental healthPragmatic trialPsychosisQuality of lifeRandomised controlled trialRecovery narrativesRecovery stories

Identifiers

PMID32690105
PMCPMC7370499
OpenAlexW3035551207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.