Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690091›Full record

Observational studyHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

Assessment of patient-centered outcomes (PROs) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a multicenter survey preceding a cross-disciplinary (functional) consensus.

Xiaohan Yan, Yuqi Qiao, Jinglu Tong, Ren Mao, Jie Liang, Cuicui Lv, Yueying Chen, Yiyan Wang, Jun Shen, Young Investigators for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (YIIBD)

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaohan YanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center; Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, 160# Pu Jian Ave, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Yuqi QiaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center; Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, 160# Pu Jian Ave, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Jinglu TongDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center; Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, 160# Pu Jian Ave, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Ren MaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.58, Zhong Shan Er Lu, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jie LiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Chang Le Xi Lu, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Cuicui LvDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Third Hospital, Liao Cheng, China.
Yueying ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhong Shan Hospital, the Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yiyan WangDepartment of statistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
Jun ShenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center; Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, 160# Pu Jian Ave, Shanghai, 200127, China. shenjunrj@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-1847
Young Investigators for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (YIIBD)

Funding

MDT project of Clinical Research Innovation Foundation, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University PYI-17-003National Natural Science Foundation of China 81770545Top-Level Clinical Discipline Project of Shanghai Pudong PWYgf 2018-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith a shift in the healthcare paradigm towards a more patient-centered approach, data on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) needs to be further explored. This study aimed to determine patient perspectives on the effect of IBD and features of patients with lower satisfaction level and compare patient and physician perception of IBD-related Quality of Care (QoC).

methodsA previously developed pre-standardised set of questions regarding patient-centered outcome (PRO) measures for IBD, comprising 36 items, was administered in five centers, and a concomitant questionnaire for specialised physicians was adapted and administered.

resultsOverall, 1005 patients with IBD met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-five questionnaires were administered to specialised physicians. Both patients and physicians perceived the IBD-related QoC as being satisfactory. Furthermore, this study revealed areas of shortcomings where it comes to patient perceptions. Female sex and the presence of negatively impacting disease characteristics (presence of significant pain or discomfort, lack of energy, feeling fatigued most of the time, experiencing anxiety or depression in the last 2 weeks) were associated with lower satisfaction levels.

conclusionsOur findings can be used in establishing strategies aimed at improving patient QoC and defining strategic priorities. These data can aid in improving the communication of the pressing needs of IBD patients, to both the public payers and health authorities.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedConsensusCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQuality of Health CareQuality of LifeYoung AdultInflammatory bowel disease (IBD)Patient-centered outcome (PRO)Quality of care (QoC)

Identifiers

PMID32690091
PMCPMC7372780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.