Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690032›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

Timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with mirror therapy on daily function and motor control in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Wan-Wen Liao, Wei-Chi Chiang, Keh-Chung Lin, Ching-Yi Wu, Chien-Ting Liu, Yu-Wei Hsieh, Yun-Chung Lin, Chia-Ling Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02827864 (Efficacy and Time Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02827864 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy and Time Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Combined With Mirror Therapy for Rehabilitation After Subacute and Chronic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled1ConditionsCerebrovascular AccidentArmssequentially apply tDCS and MT, apply tDCS concurrently, MT with sham tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Comparative efficacy of different noninvasive brain stimulation protocols on upper-extremity motor function and activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Wan-Wen LiaoDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-hwa 1st Road, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Wei-Chi ChiangDepartment of Occupational Therapy, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Keh-Chung LinSchool of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ching-Yi WuDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-hwa 1st Road, Taoyuan City, Taiwan. cywu@mail.cgu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-4726-2916
Chien-Ting LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu-Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Wei HsiehDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-hwa 1st Road, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Yun-Chung LinKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chia-Ling ChenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Chang Gung University · TWChang Gung University of Science and Technology · TWI-Shou University · TWKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TWTaipei Tzu Chi Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe timing of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with neurorehabilitation interventions may affect its modulatory effects. Motor function has been reported to be modulated by the timing of tDCS; however, whether the timing of tDCS would also affect restoration of daily function and upper extremity motor control with neurorehabilitation in stroke patients remains largely unexplored. Mirror therapy (MT) is a potentially effective neurorehabilitation approach for improving paretic arm function in stroke patients. This study aimed to determine whether the timing of tDCS with MT would influence treatment effects on daily function, motor function and motor control in individuals with chronic stroke.

methodsThis study was a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Twenty-eight individuals with chronic stroke received one of the following three interventions: (1) sequentially combined tDCS with MT (SEQ), (2) concurrently combined tDCS with MT (CON), and (3) sham tDCS with MT (SHAM). Participants received interventions for 90 min/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. Daily function was assessed using the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Upper extremity motor function was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale. Upper extremity motor control was evaluated using movement kinematic assessments.

resultsThere were significant differences in daily function between the three groups. The SEQ group had greater improvement in daily function than the CON and SHAM groups. Kinematic analyses showed that movement time of the paretic hand significantly reduced in the SEQ group after interventions. All three groups had significant improvement in motor function from pre-intervention to post-intervention.

conclusionThe timing of tDCS with MT may influence restoration of daily function and movement efficiency of the paretic hand in chronic stroke patients. Sequentially applying tDCS prior to MT seems to be advantageous for enhancing daily function and hand movement control, and may be considered as a potentially useful strategy in future clinical application.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02827864 . Registered on 29th June, 2016.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationUpper ExtremityActivities of daily livingMirror therapyStrokeTiming-dependent effectTranscranial direct current stimulationUpper extremity kinematics

Identifiers

PMID32690032
PMCPMC7370428
OpenAlexW3042974296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.