Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690031›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

LogicNet: probabilistic continuous logics in reconstructing gene regulatory networks.

Seyed Amir Malekpour, Amir Reza Alizad-Rahvar, Mehdi Sadeghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seyed Amir MalekpourSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran. a.malekpour@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3525-3548
Amir Reza Alizad-RahvarSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi SadeghiNational Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) have been previously studied by using Boolean/multi-state logics. While the gene expression values are usually scaled into the range [0, 1], these GRN inference methods apply a threshold to discretize the data, resulting in missing information. Most of studies apply fuzzy logics to infer the logical gene-gene interactions from continuous data. However, all these approaches require an a priori known network structure.

resultsHere, by introducing a new probabilistic logic for continuous data, we propose a novel logic-based approach (called the LogicNet) for the simultaneous reconstruction of the GRN structure and identification of the logics among the regulatory genes, from the continuous gene expression data. In contrast to the previous approaches, the LogicNet does not require an a priori known network structure to infer the logics. The proposed probabilistic logic is superior to the existing fuzzy logics and is more relevant to the biological contexts than the fuzzy logics. The performance of the LogicNet is superior to that of several Mutual Information-based and regression-based tools for reconstructing GRNs.

conclusionsThe LogicNet reconstructs GRNs and logic functions without requiring prior knowledge of the network structure. Moreover, in another application, the LogicNet can be applied for logic function detection from the known regulatory genes-target interactions. We also conclude that computational modeling of the logical interactions among the regulatory genes significantly improves the GRN reconstruction accuracy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFuzzy LogicGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, RegulatorModels, GeneticComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEscherichia coliGene Expression ProfilingBayes factor (BF)Bayesian information criterion (BIC)Fuzzy logicGene expression dataGene regulatory networkProbabilistic logic

Identifiers

PMID32690031
PMCPMC7372900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.