Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690006›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

The addition of Lactobacillus spp. negatively affects Mycoplasma bovis viability in bovine cervical mucus.

A García-Galán, C De la Fe, J Gomis, E Bataller, A Sánchez, J J Quereda, E García-Roselló, A Gómez-Martín

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In Vitro Interaction betweenMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Use of probiotic lactobacilli in the treatment of vaginal infections:Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Importance and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A García-GalánRuminant Health Research Group, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
C De la FeRuminant Health Research Group, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain. cdelafe@um.es.
J GomisMicrobiological Agents Associated with Reproduction (ProVaginBio) Research Group, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, 46113, Valencia, Spain.
E BatallerMicrobiological Agents Associated with Reproduction (ProVaginBio) Research Group, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, 46113, Valencia, Spain.
A SánchezRuminant Health Research Group, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
J J QueredaMicrobiological Agents Associated with Reproduction (ProVaginBio) Research Group, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, 46113, Valencia, Spain.
E García-RosellóMicrobiological Agents Associated with Reproduction (ProVaginBio) Research Group, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, 46113, Valencia, Spain.
A Gómez-MartínRuminant Health Research Group, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

Fundación Banco Santander FUSP-SantanderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad, cofinanced by FEDER funds AGL2016-76568-RState Subprogram Training of the State Program for the Promotion of Talent and its Employability BES-2017-080186Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera PRCEU-UCH 04/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycoplasma bovis is an important pathogen for the cattle industry worldwide causing significant economic losses. Several transmission routes, including those related to reproduction, have been described. Indeed, the pathogen can colonize the female reproductive tract after artificial insemination (AI) with contaminated semen. Lactobacillus spp.-based probiotics have been used for vaginal dysbiosis treatment in women and cows although their role in controlling cervico-vaginal infections due to M. bovis is unknown. The objective of the present work is to assess the viability of M. bovis (PG45, NCTC 10131) in experimentally contaminated cervical mucus after the addition of Lactobacillus spp. at different concentrations as a competing agent and pH acidifier.

resultsThe addition of probiotic at a concentration higher than 10

conclusionThe addition of concentrations higher than 10

Indexed as

LactobacillusAnimalsCattleCervix MucusFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMycoplasma bovisProbioticsCervical mucusCowsIn vitroLactobacillus spp.Mycoplasma bovisViability

Identifiers

PMID32690006
PMCPMC7370443
OpenAlexW3043373548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.