ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2020
Complementary and alternative medicine use in coronary heart disease patients: a cross-sectional study from Palestine.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Professional Use and Acceptance of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study From a Developing Country.Nursing open · 2026Review
- Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among osteoarthritis patients in a developing country and their level of satisfaction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the use of complementary and alternative medicine for influenza management: a cross-sectional study from Palestine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Therapeutic efficacy of combined esmolol and carvedilol treatment for myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary heart disease.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine use: Influenza vaccine intake.PloS one · 2025Article
- The use of complementary and alternative medicine among surgical patients: a cross-sectional study.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- Investigation of high-dose radiotherapy's effect on brain structure aggravated cognitive impairment and deteriorated patient psychological status in brain tumor treatment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Complementary and alternative medicine use among pediatrics in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- The use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study from Palestine.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Use of complementary and alternative therapies by patients with eye diseases: a hospital-based cross-sectional study from Palestine.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a lack of data on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). This study examined the use of CAM among patients with CHD, the reasons and factors influencing their use, the types of CAM used, and the relationship between patient's demographics and the use of CAM.
methodsIn order to determine the prevalence and usage of CAM among Palestinian patients with CHD, a cross-sectional descriptive study was performed from three different hospitals. Using a convenient sampling method, a questionnaire was completed in a face-to-face interview with the patients. Descriptive statistics were used for socio-demographic, and clinical variables. Siahpush scale was used to examine the attitude of CHD patients toward CAM use.
resultsOf the 150 patients that were interviewed, 128 (85.3%) of the patients completed the questionnaire. The majority of CAM users reported CAM use for health problems other than CHD, while a total of 59 (45.9%) patients have used CAM for their heart problems. On the other hand, it was found that the place of residency and pattern of CHD were significantly associated with CAM use (p = 0.039 and 0.044, respectively). In addition, religious practices were found to be the most common form of CAM used by patients, while body and traditional alternative methods were the least being used. A significant association between the attitudes of patients with CHD and their use of CAM was found (patients' attitudes towards alternative medicine and natural remedies were p = 0.011 and 0.044, respectively).
conclusionsCAM use among our respondents is common. Despite a lack of evidence-based research supporting its potential benefits and side effects. Understanding the factors that affect CAM use by CHD patients offers healthcare workers and policymakers an opportunity to better understand CAM use and ultimately improve patient-physician interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.