Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32689973›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2020

Influence of pupil dilation on the Barrett universal II (new generation), Haigis (4th generation), and SRK/T (3rd generation) intraocular lens calculation formulas: a retrospective study.

Takeshi Teshigawara, Akira Meguro, Nobuhisa Mizuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of the White-to-White Distance in 39,986 Chinese Cataractous Eyes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of residual refractive prediction accuracy after phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formula.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  16. Analysis of accuracy of twelve intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes with axial hyperopia.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takeshi TeshigawaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yokosuka Chuoh Eye Clinic, 238-0008, 2-6 Odaki-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan. teshitake@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8264-101X
Akira MeguroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Nobuhisa MizukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the surge in the number of cataract surgeries, there is limited information available regarding the influence of pupil dilation on predicted postoperative refraction and its comparison with recommended various intraocular lens power calculated using the different parameters. We used three different IOL power calculation formulas: Barrett Universal II (Barrett) (5-variable formula), Haigis (3-variable formula), and SRK/T (2-variable formula), in order to investigate the potential effect of pupil dilation on the predicted postoperative refraction (PPR) and recommended intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.

methodsThis retrospective study included 150 eyes. All variables were measured and calculated using a ZEISS IOL Master 700. The following variables were measured before and after dilation: anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white (WTW). PPR and recommended IOL power were calculated by Barrett, Haigis, and SRK/T IOL calculation formulas. The change in each variable before and after dilation, and the correlations between all changes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Spearman's rank-order correlation test, respectively.

resultsThe mean absolute change (MAC) in PPR before and after dilation was found to be highest in the Barrett formula. Significant differences were found between each MAC (P <  0.0001). Significant changes were observed before and after dilation in ACD and LT (P <  0.0001), but not in WTW. Using the Barrett and Haigis formulas, there was a significant positive correlation between the change in PPR and change in ACD (P <  0.0001), and a negative correlation between change in PPR and change in LT (P <  0.0001). The correlations were strongest with the Barret formula followed by the Haigis, particularly in terms of LT. Changes in PPR determined by the Barrett formula also demonstrated a significant positive correlation with changes in WTW (P = 0.022). The recommended IOL power determined using Barrett and Haigis changed before and after dilation in 23.3 and 19.3% cases respectively, while SRK/T showed no change.

conclusionsIn terms of PPR and recommended IOL power, pupil dilation influenced mostly the Barrett formula. Given the stronger correlation between the changes in PPR when using Barrett and the changes in ACD, LT, and WTW, changes in ACD, LT, and WTW significantly affect how dilation influences the Barrett formula. Determining how dilation influences each formula and other variables is key to improving the accuracy of IOL calculations.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularPupilBiometryHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularOptics and PhotonicsRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesAnterior chamber depthBarrettHaigisIntraocular lensLens thicknessPredicted postoperative refractionPupil dilationSRK/TWhite-to-white

Identifiers

PMID32689973
PMCPMC7372826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.