Trial reportThe Journal of international medical research2020
Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial.
Trial report in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02064075 (Phase 4 Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Study on the Effect of Different Hydration Strategies on Mortality and Changes in Quality of Life of Patients Suffering From Subarachnoid Haemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 4 Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Study on the Effect of Different Hydration Strategies on Mortality and Changes in Quality of Life of Patients Suffering From Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the effect of two prophylactic euvolemic fluid strategy regimens on the incidence of cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
methodsNinety-six patients with a basal intravenous intake of 15 mL/kg/day of Ringer's lactate solution were included, and an additional 15 to 50 mL/kg/day Ringer's lactate (RL-group) or hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 solution (HES-group) was administered to maintain the targeted mean arterial pressure. The primary end point was the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm during the first 14 days. The secondary end points were case fatality, Barthel's index, and Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) at 30 days after SAH.
resultsCerebral vasospasm developed in 42 patients (43.7%), and nine of these events were severe. The vasospasm rate among the RL- and HES-based groups was 25/48 and 17/48, respectively. For the secondary endpoint, four patients (4%) died by the end of follow-up (two in each group). Unfavorable outcome cases were not different in the RL and HES groups (9 vs. 14, respectively). There was no difference between the Barthel's scores at 30 days between the two groups.
conclusionsUsing starches in a prophylactic treatment strategy in aneurysmal SAH in not supported by the study.The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT02064075.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.