Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32689770›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2020

Fertility-sparing treatment in early endometrial cancer: current state and future strategies.

Andreas Obermair, Eva Baxter, Donal J Brennan, Jessica N McAlpine, Jennifer J Muellerer, Frédéric Amant, Mignon D J M van Gent, Robert L Coleman, Shannon N Westin, Melinda S Yates and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Survey of Australian Practice.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Phosphorylation of IDH1 Facilitates Progestin Resistance in Endometrial Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Andreas ObermairQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Eva BaxterQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Donal J BrennanDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, UCD School of Medicine, Catherine McAuley Research Centre, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Ireland.
Jessica N McAlpineDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Jennifer J MuellererDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA.
Frédéric AmantDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mignon D J M van GentCenter for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, AVLNKI and Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert L ColemanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shannon N WestinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Melinda S YatesDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Camilla KrakstadCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Monika JandaCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBC Cancer Agency · CAHaukeland University Hospital · NOKU Leuven · BEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748Queensland Centre for Gynecological Cancer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fifth most common cancer in women worldwide. Global estimates show rising incidence rates in both developed and developing countries. Most women are diagnosed postmenopausal, but 14-25% of patients are premenopausal and 5% are under 40 years of age. Established risk factors include age and hyperestrogenic status associated with nulliparity, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Standard treatment for EC, which involves total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, has excellent survival outcomes, particularly for low-grade endometrioid tumors. However, it leads to permanent loss of fertility among women who wish to preserve their reproductive potential. With current trends of reproductive-age women delaying childbearing, rising EC incidence rates, and a growing epidemic of obesity, particularly in developed countries, research on conservative non-surgical treatment approaches remains a top priority. Fertility-sparing treatment predominantly involves the use of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices, which have been shown to be feasible and safe in women with early stage EC and minimal or no myometrial invasion. However, data on the efficacy and safety of conservative management strategies are primarily based on retrospective studies. Randomized clinical trials in younger women and high-risk obese patients are currently underway. Here, we have presented a comprehensive review of the current literature on conservative, fertility-sparing approaches, defining the optimal candidates and evaluating tumor characteristics, reproductive and oncologic outcomes, and ongoing clinical trials. We have also summarized current guidelines and recommendations based on the published literature.

Indexed as

Conservative treatmentEndometrial cancerFertility preservationProgestin

Identifiers

PMID32689770
PMCPMC7393748
OpenAlexW3043753327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.