Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32689650›Full record

ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2020

Collateral damage - Impact of a pandemic on stroke emergency services.

Shashvat M Desai, Francis X Guyette, Christian Martin-Gill, Ashutosh P Jadhav

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Changing the stroke network during pandemic scenarios does not affect the management of patients with a positive Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 and ischemic stroke.European journal of neurology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. EMS responses and non-transports during the COVID-19 pandemic.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Trends in Healthcare Access in Japan during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic, up to June 2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Making the case for strong health information systems during a pandemic and beyond.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shashvat M DesaiDepartments of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15218, United States. Electronic address: desaism@upmc.edu.
Francis X GuyetteDepartments of Emergency, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: guyefx@upmc.edu.
Christian Martin-GillDepartments of Emergency, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: martingillc2@upmc.edu.
Ashutosh P JadhavDepartments of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15218, United States; Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: jadhav.library@gmail.com.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic's impact on stroke care is two-fold direct impact of the infection and indirect impact on non-COVID-19 diseases. Anecdotal evidence and clinical observation suggest that there is a decrease in the number of patients presenting with stroke during the pandemic. We aim to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the utilization of stroke emergency services on a single comprehensive stroke center (CSC).

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database and compared all emergency department (ED) encounters, acute stroke admissions (including TIA), and thrombectomy cases admitted in March 2017-2019 to patients admitted in March 2020 at a comprehensive stroke center.

resultsNumber of total ED encounters (22%, p=0.005), acute ischemic strokes (40%, p=0.001), and TIAs (60%, p=0.163) decreased between March of 2017-2019 compared to March of 2020. The number of patients undergoing EVT in March 2020 was comparable to March 2017-2019 (p=0.430).

conclusionA pandemic-related stay-at-home policy reduces the utilization of stroke emergency services at a CSC. This effect appears to be more prominent for ED encounters, all stroke admissions and TIAs, and less impactful for severe strokes. Given the relatively low prevalence of COVID-19 cases in our region, this decrement is likely related to healthcare seeking behavior rather than capacity saturation.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Databases, FactualEmergency Medical ServicesHealth Services Needs and DemandHost Microbial InteractionsHumansNeeds AssessmentNeurologyPandemicsPennsylvaniaPneumonia, ViralRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2StrokeCovidEpidemiologyStrokethrombectomyTIA

Identifiers

PMID32689650
PMCPMC7284271
OpenAlexW3035581356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.