ArticlePhysical review. E2020
Quantifying epigenetic stability with minimum action paths.
Article in Physical review. E, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preserving condensate structure and composition by lowering sequence complexity.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Role of diffusion and reaction of the constituents in spreading of histone modification marks.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Multiscale modeling of genome organization with maximum entropy optimization.The Journal of chemical physics · 2021Article
- A Dimension Reduction Approach for Energy Landscape: Identifying Intermediate States in Metabolism-EMT Network.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Article
- Characterizing chromatin folding coordinate and landscape with deep learning.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Quantifying the Stability of Coupled Genetic and Epigenetic Switches With Variational Methods.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromatin can adopt multiple stable, heritable states with distinct histone modifications and varying levels of gene expression. Insight on the stability and maintenance of such epigenetic states can be gained by mathematical modeling of stochastic reaction networks for histone modifications. Analytical results for the kinetic networks are particularly valuable. Compared to computationally demanding numerical simulations, they often are more convenient at evaluating the robustness of conclusions with respect to model parameters. In this communication, we developed a second-quantization-based approach that can be used to analyze discrete stochastic models with a fixed, finite number of particles using a representation of the SU(2) algebra. We applied the approach to a kinetic model of chromatin states that captures the feedback between nucleosomes and the enzymes conferring histone modifications. Using a path-integral expression for the transition probability, we computed the epigenetic landscape that helps to identify the emergence of bistability and the most probable path connecting the two steady states. We anticipate the generalizability of the approach will make it useful for studying more complicated models that couple epigenetic modifications with transcription factors and chromatin structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.