Trial reportBlood2020
Outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with CLL: a multicenter international experience.
Trial report in Blood, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 200 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
200 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Vaccine challenges in CLL: a comprehensive exploration of efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 immunization for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2024Pooled it
- Outcomes of COVID-19 infection in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Pooled it
- Predictors of clinical evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hematological patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hematological oncology · 2023Pooled it
- COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in Patients With Lymphoid Malignancy or Anti-CD20 Antibody Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2022Pooled it
- Differences in Outcomes and Factors Associated With Mortality Among Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Cancer Compared With Those Without Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2022Pooled it
- Managing hematological cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO-EHA Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus.ESMO open · 2022Guideline
- Pooled it
- Pre-existing health conditions and severe COVID-19 outcomes: an umbrella review approach and meta-analysis of global evidence.BMC medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Mortality in adult patients with solid or hematological malignancies and SARS-CoV-2 infection with a specific focus on lung and breast cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2021Pooled it
- Asthma in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2021Pooled it
- The effect of anticancer treatment on cancer patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Antibody Responses to COVID-19 Vaccination in Cancer: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Humoral response to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine and booster effect of a third dose in patients with mature T cell and NK-cell neoplasms.Annals of hematology · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Humoral and cellular immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a prospective cohort study.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Poor neutralizing antibody responses in 106 patients with WM after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a prospective study.Blood advances · 2021Trial
- COVID-19 elicits an impaired antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with haematological malignancies.British journal of haematology · 2021Trial
140 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
62 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given advanced age, comorbidities, and immune dysfunction, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients may be at particularly high risk of infection and poor outcomes related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Robust analysis of outcomes for CLL patients, particularly examining effects of baseline characteristics and CLL-directed therapy, is critical to optimally manage CLL patients through this evolving pandemic. CLL patients diagnosed with symptomatic COVID-19 across 43 international centers (n = 198) were included. Hospital admission occurred in 90%. Median age at COVID-19 diagnosis was 70.5 years. Median Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score was 8 (range, 4-32). Thirty-nine percent were treatment naive ("watch and wait"), while 61% had received ≥1 CLL-directed therapy (median, 2; range, 1-8). Ninety patients (45%) were receiving active CLL therapy at COVID-19 diagnosis, most commonly Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi's; n = 68/90 [76%]). At a median follow-up of 16 days, the overall case fatality rate was 33%, though 25% remain admitted. Watch-and-wait and treated cohorts had similar rates of admission (89% vs 90%), intensive care unit admission (35% vs 36%), intubation (33% vs 25%), and mortality (37% vs 32%). CLL-directed treatment with BTKi's at COVID-19 diagnosis did not impact survival (case fatality rate, 34% vs 35%), though the BTKi was held during the COVID-19 course for most patients. These data suggest that the subgroup of CLL patients admitted with COVID-19, regardless of disease phase or treatment status, are at high risk of death. Future epidemiologic studies are needed to assess severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection risk, these data should be validated independently, and randomized studies of BTKi's in COVID-19 are needed to provide definitive evidence of benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.