Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32688388›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2020

Aspects of Technology That Influence Athletic Trainers' Current Patient Care Documentation Strategies in the Secondary School.

Sara L Nottingham, Tricia M Kasamatsu, Lindsey E Eberman, Elizabeth R Neil, Cailee E Welch Bacon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara L NottinghamDepartment of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Tricia M KasamatsuDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton.
Lindsey E EbermanDepartment of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute.
Elizabeth R NeilDepartment of Sport Studies, Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH.
Cailee E Welch BaconDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPrevious research on athletic trainers' (ATs) documentation practices in the secondary school setting has focused on users of 1 electronic medical record (EMR) platform. These studies have identified that ATs use multiple platforms for documentation, including paper, even when an EMR is available.

objectiveTo examine the documentation practices of ATs who use various forms of patient care documentation, including paper, EMRs, or both.

designQualitative study.

settingIndividual telephone interviews. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsTwenty ATs participated in this study: 12 women and 8 men who averaged 38 ± 14 years of age, 15 ± 13 years of clinical experience, and 11 ± 11 years of employment at their current secondary school. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted to gain insight into ATs' documentation practices. Three researchers and 2 auditors inductively coded the transcripts using a consensual qualitative research process that consisted of 4 rounds of consensus coding and determination of data saturation. Trustworthiness was addressed with member checking, multiple-analyst triangulation, and peer review.

resultsThe ATs' documentation practices were largely influenced by technology, organized in 3 themes. Participants' current documentation strategies included the use of both paper and EMRs, as they found different benefits to using each platform. Oftentimes documentation practices were shaped by technological challenges, including unreliable networks, software design problems, and the lack of a streamlined approach. Lastly, participants identified future strategies for improving documentation, including the need for better EMR options and streamlining their individual documentation behaviors.

conclusionsMany ATs wanted to incorporate EMRs in their clinical practice but faced challenges when attempting to do so. In turn, clinicians often duplicated documentation or used 2 platforms. Athletic trainers should communicate with administrators to select an EMR that fits their documentation needs and seek resources, such as network access and educational opportunities, to learn how to use EMRs.

Indexed as

DocumentationElectronic Health RecordsSchoolsAdultFemaleHumansMaleNeeds AssessmentPhysical Education and TrainingQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementTeacher Trainingelectronic medical recordsmedical recordsqualitative researchquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32688388
PMCPMC7462177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.