Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32687792›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2020

Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit-risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Kaja Abbas, Simon R Procter, Kevin van Zandvoort, Andrew Clark, Sebastian Funk, Tewodaj Mengistu, Dan Hogan, Emily Dansereau, Mark Jit, Stefan Flasche and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 210 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
37.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 370 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Immunization Campaigns and Programs: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sixth wave of global public health progress.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kaja AbbasLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: kaja.abbas@lshtm.ac.uk.
Simon R ProcterLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kevin van ZandvoortLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Andrew ClarkLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sebastian FunkLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Tewodaj MengistuGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dan HoganGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Emily DansereauBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mark JitLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Public Health England, London, UK; University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Stefan FlascheLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
LSHTM CMMID COVID-19 Working Group
Gavi · CHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Hong Kong · HKPublic Health England · GBBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19065Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208812/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 210758/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust 221303/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational immunisation programmes globally are at risk of suspension due to the severe health system constraints and physical distancing measures in place to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to compare the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa with the risk of acquiring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection through visiting routine vaccination service delivery points.

methodsWe considered a high-impact scenario and a low-impact scenario to approximate the child deaths that could be caused by immunisation coverage reductions during COVID-19 outbreaks. In the high-impact scenario, we used previously reported country-specific child mortality impact estimates of childhood immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, measles, meningitis A, rubella, and yellow fever to approximate the future deaths averted before 5 years of age by routine childhood vaccination during a 6-month COVID-19 risk period without catch-up campaigns. In the low-impact scenario, we approximated the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation on only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks during the COVID-19 risk period. We assumed that contact-reducing interventions flattened the outbreak curve during the COVID-19 risk period, that 60% of the population will have been infected by the end of that period, that children can be infected by either vaccinators or during transport, and that upon child infection the whole household will be infected. Country-specific household age structure estimates and age-dependent infection-fatality rates were applied to calculate the number of deaths attributable to the vaccination clinic visits. We present benefit-risk ratios for routine childhood immunisation, with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

findingsIn the high-impact scenario, for every one excess COVID-19 death attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infections acquired during routine vaccination clinic visits, 84 (95% UI 14-267) deaths in children could be prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa. The benefit-risk ratio for the vaccinated children is 85 000 (4900-546 000), for their siblings (<20 years) is 75 000 (4400-483 000), for their parents or adult carers (aged 20-60 years) is 769 (148-2700), and for older adults (>60 years) is 96 (14-307). In the low-impact scenario that approximates the health benefits to only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks, the benefit-risk ratio to the households of vaccinated children is 3 (0-10); if the risk to only the vaccinated children is considered, the benefit-risk ratio is 3000 (182-21 000).

interpretationThe deaths prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa outweigh the excess risk of COVID-19 deaths associated with vaccination clinic visits, especially for the vaccinated children. Routine childhood immunisation should be sustained in Africa as much as possible, while considering other factors such as logistical constraints, staff shortages, and reallocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.

fundingGavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

PandemicsAfricaAmbulatory CareChild, PreschoolCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross InfectionHumansImmunization ProgramsImmunization ScheduleInfantPneumonia, ViralRisk AssessmentVaccine-Preventable DiseasesVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID32687792
PMCPMC7367673
OpenAlexW3042434201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.