Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32687543›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to Rh(D) incompatibility: A preventable disease that still produces significant morbidity and mortality in children.

Valeria Pegoraro, Ducciocompet Urbinati, Gerard H A Visser, Gian Carlo Di Renzo, Alvin Zipursky, Brie A Stotler, Steven L Spitalnik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reporting of management and outcomes in the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a systematic literature review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. [Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of anemia of prematurity (2025)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. FIGO/ICM guidelines for preventing Rhesus disease: A call to action.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bridging the Gap: High-ResolutionHuman mutation · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. 20 years experience of RhD alloimmunization at a state referral center in Rio de Janeiro: a study of 481 cases.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Valeria PegoraroIQVIA Solutions Italy S.r.l., Milan, Italy.
Ducciocompet UrbinatiIQVIA Solutions Italy S.r.l., Milan, Italy.
Gerard H A VisserDepartments of Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Gian Carlo Di RenzoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alvin ZipurskyHospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brie A StotlerDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Steven L SpitalnikDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-4561
Columbia University · USHospital for Sick Children · CASechenov University · RUUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the mid-20th century, Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn, caused by maternal alloimmunization to the Rh(D) blood group antigen expressed by fetal red blood cells (i.e., "Rh disease"), was a major cause of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, with the regulatory approval, in 1968, of IgG anti-Rh(D) immunoprophylaxis to prevent maternal sensitization, the prospect of eradicating Rh disease was at hand. Indeed, the combination of antenatal and post-partum immunoprophylaxis is ~99% effective at preventing maternal sensitization to Rh(D). To investigate global compliance with this therapeutic intervention, we used an epidemiological approach to estimate the current annual number of pregnancies worldwide involving an Rh(D)-negative mother and an Rh(D)-positive fetus. The annual number of doses of anti-Rh(D) IgG required for successful immunoprophylaxis for these cases was then calculated and compared with an estimate of the annual number of doses of anti-Rh(D) produced and provided worldwide. Our results suggest that ~50% of the women around the world who require this type of immunoprophylaxis do not receive it, presumably due to a lack of awareness, availability, and/or affordability, thereby putting hundreds of thousands of fetuses and neonates at risk for Rh disease each year. The global failure to provide this generally acknowledged standard-of-care to prevent Rh disease, even 50 years after its availability, contributes to an enormous, continuing burden of fetal and neonatal disease and provides a critically important challenge to the international health care system.

Indexed as

Erythroblastosis, FetalFemaleHumansImmunotherapyInfant, NewbornPregnancyRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRh IsoimmunizationRho(D) Immune GlobulinRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRHO(D) antibodyRho(D) Immune Globulin

Identifiers

PMID32687543
PMCPMC7371205
OpenAlexW3044439164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.