Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32687490›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Proteome-wide identification of HSP70/HSC70 chaperone clients in human cells.

Seung W Ryu, Rose Stewart, D Chase Pectol, Nicolette A Ender, Oshadi Wimalarathne, Ji-Hoon Lee, Carlos P Zanini, Antony Harvey, Jon M Huibregtse, Peter Mueller and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Human Hsp70 paralogs display selective J-domain interactions tuning proteostasis under stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanisms and regulation of the Hsp70 chaperone network.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recent insights into HSP70: proteostasis and beyond.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seung W RyuThe Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3509-1208
Rose StewartThe Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
D Chase PectolThe Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-4900
Nicolette A EnderThe Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Oshadi WimalarathneThe Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Ji-Hoon LeeThe Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7387-935X
Carlos P ZaniniDepartment of Statistics & Data Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6516-4258
Antony HarveyThermo Fisher Scientific, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5246-0434
Jon M HuibregtseThe Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Peter MuellerDepartment of Statistics & Data Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Tanya T PaullThe Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2991-651X
The University of Texas at Austin · USTexas A&M University · USThermo Fisher Scientific (United States) · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSP70) family of chaperones are the front line of protection from stress-induced misfolding and aggregation of polypeptides in most organisms and are responsible for promoting the stability, folding, and degradation of clients to maintain cellular protein homeostasis. Here, we demonstrate quantitative identification of HSP70 and 71 kDa heat shock cognate (HSC70) clients using a ubiquitin-mediated proximity tagging strategy and show that, despite their high degree of similarity, these enzymes have largely nonoverlapping specificities. Both proteins show a preference for association with newly synthesized polypeptides, but each responds differently to changes in the stoichiometry of proteins in obligate multi-subunit complexes. In addition, expression of an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)-associated superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) mutant protein induces changes in HSP70 and HSC70 client association and aggregation toward polypeptides with predicted disorder, indicating that there are global effects from a single misfolded protein that extend to many clients within chaperone networks. Together these findings show that the ubiquitin-activated interaction trap (UBAIT) fusion system can efficiently isolate the complex interactome of HSP chaperone family proteins under normal and stress conditions.

Indexed as

Cell LineHSC70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMutationProtein BindingProtein BiosynthesisProtein FoldingProteomeSubstrate SpecificityUbiquitinHSC70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsProteomeUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID32687490
PMCPMC7392334
OpenAlexW3043788372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.