Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32687191›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgery2020

Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review of the Literature for the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.

Daniel G Eichberg, Gregory W Basil, Long Di, Ashish H Shah, Evan M Luther, Victor M Lu, Maggy Perez-Dickens, Ricardo J Komotar, Allan D Levi, Michael E Ivan

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Structural equation modeling of findings in pediatric tele-neuroradiology: a 2-year nationwide study of turnaround time predictors and clinical decision support.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Parental Satisfaction from Telemedicine in the Follow-up of Children Operated for Craniosynostosis during COVID-19 Pandemic.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel G EichbergUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Gregory W BasilUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Long DiUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Ashish H ShahUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Evan M LutherUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Victor M LuUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Maggy Perez-DickensUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Ricardo J KomotarUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Allan D LeviUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
Michael E IvanUniversity of Miami, Department of Neurosurgery, Miami, Florida.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvolving requirements for patient and physician safety and rapid regulatory changes have stimulated interest in neurosurgical telemedicine in the COVID-19 era.

objectiveTo conduct a systematic literature review investigating treatment of neurosurgical patients via telemedicine, and to evaluate barriers and challenges. Additionally, we review recent regulatory changes that affect telemedicine in neurosurgery, and our institution's initial experience.

methodsA systematic review was performed including all studies investigating success regarding treatment of neurosurgical patients via telemedicine. We reviewed our department's outpatient clinic billing records after telemedicine was implemented from 3/23/2020 to 4/6/2020 and reviewed modifier 95 inclusion to determine the number of face-to-face and telemedicine visits, as well as breakdown of weekly telemedicine clinic visits by subspecialty.

resultsA total of 52 studies (25 prospective and 27 retrospective) with 45 801 patients were analyzed. A total of 13 studies were conducted in the United States and 39 in foreign countries. Patient management was successful via telemedicine in 99.6% of cases. Telemedicine visits failed in 162 cases, 81.5% of which were due to technology failure, and 18.5% of which were due to patients requiring further face-to-face evaluation or treatment. A total of 16 studies compared telemedicine encounters to alternative patient encounter mediums; telemedicine was equivalent or superior in 15 studies. From 3/23/2020 to 4/6/2020, our department had 122 telemedicine visits (65.9%) and 63 face-to-face visits (34.1%). About 94.3% of telemedicine visits were billed using face-to-face procedural codes.

conclusionNeurosurgical telemedicine encounters appear promising in resource-scarce times, such as during global pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineTreatment OutcomeCoronavirusCOVID-19Health policyNeurosurgeryStrokeTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32687191
PMCPMC7454774
OpenAlexW3043255610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.