Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32687177›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2020

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Naphthalene With Inhalation and Skin Routes of Exposure.

Dustin F Kapraun, Paul M Schlosser, Leena A Nylander-French, David Kim, Erin E Yost, Ingrid L Druwe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bayesian PBPK modeling using R/Stan/Torsten and Julia/SciML/Turing.Jl.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dustin F KapraunCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina 27711.
Paul M SchlosserCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina 27711.
Leena A Nylander-FrenchDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
David KimDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Erin E YostCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina 27711.
Ingrid L DruweCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina 27711.
Environmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naphthalene, a volatile organic compound present in moth repellants and petroleum-based fuels, has been shown to induce toxicity in mice and rats during chronic inhalation exposures. Although simpler default methods exist for extrapolating toxicity points of departure from animals to humans, using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to perform such extrapolations is generally preferred. Confidence in PBPK models increases when they have been validated using both animal and human in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) data. A published inhalation PBPK model for naphthalene was previously shown to predict rodent PK data well, so we sought to evaluate this model using human PK data. The most reliable human data available come from a controlled skin exposure study, but the inhalation PBPK model does not include a skin exposure route; therefore, we extended the model by incorporating compartments representing the stratum corneum and the viable epidermis and parameters that determine absorption and rate of transport through the skin. The human data revealed measurable blood concentrations of naphthalene present in the subjects prior to skin exposure, so we also introduced a continuous dose-rate parameter to account for these baseline blood concentration levels. We calibrated the three new parameters in the modified PBPK model using data from the controlled skin exposure study but did not modify values for any other parameters. Model predictions then fell within a factor of 2 of most (96%) of the human PK observations, demonstrating that this model can accurately predict internal doses of naphthalene and is thus a viable tool for use in human health risk assessment.

Indexed as

Inhalation ExposureModels, BiologicalAdministration, InhalationAnimalsMiceNaphthalenesRatsSkinNaphthalenesCFDcomputational fluid dynamicsPBPK modelskin model

Identifiers

PMID32687177
PMCPMC8023980
OpenAlexW3045368667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.