ArticleJournal of animal science2020
The impact of feed efficiency selection on the ruminal, cecal, and fecal microbiomes of Angus steers from a commercial feedlot.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effects of Breeding Methods on Cecal Microflora and Production Traits of Yimeng Black Goats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Hindgut Microbiota and Volatile Fatty Acid Profile of Steers Fed Finishing Feedlot Ration Supplemented with or Without Calcium Gluconate.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Distinct Gut Microbiome Characteristics Associated with Mental Health Symptoms of Healthy Adults.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Effect of divergent residual feed intake on the fecal microbiota in fattening Hanwoo steers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of whole-herd vaccination on a caprine coxiellosis outbreak: a longitudinal study ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Exploring genome, transcriptome, and microbiome interactions related to feed efficiency and methane emissions in Bos indicus through multi-omics network analysis.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Article
- Microbial Biomarkers Differ for Various Feed Efficiency Metrics in Beef Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Maternal administration of octanoate, a medium-chain fatty acid, improves feed efficiency of Japanese black calves through influencing gut bacteriome structure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the cecal microbial community associated with fat deposition in sheep and its possible pathways of action.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Oregano essential oil enhanced body weight and well-being by modulating the HPA axis and 23-nordeoxycholic acid of cecal microbiota in Holstein steers under cold stress.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Life at the borderlands: microbiomes of interfaces critical to One Health.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- The effects of residual energy intake on nutrient use, methane emissions and microbial composition in dairy cows.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Effects of Dietary Manganese and Selenium on Growth and the Fecal Microbiota of Nursery Piglets.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Rumen and cecum bacteria of beef cattle that differ in feed efficiency fed a forage diet.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Fecal microbial transplantation limits neural injury severity and functional deficits in a pediatric piglet traumatic brain injury model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Rumen and fecal microbiomes are related to diet and production traits inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Dietary supplementation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Cecal microbiota of feedlot cattle fed a four-species Bacillus supplement.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Impact of concentrations of camphor on the in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation from goats selected for consumption of low and high levels ofTranslational animal science · 2022Article
- Fecal Microbiome Differences in Angus Steers with Differing Feed Efficiencies during the Feedlot-Finishing Phase.Microorganisms · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feed is the greatest cost of animal production, so reducing it is critical to increase producer profits. In ruminants, the microbial population within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is critical to nutrient digestion and absorption in both the rumen and the hindgut. The objective of this study was to determine the bacterial taxonomic profile of the rumen, cecum, and feces of feedlot steers at slaughter in order to link feed efficiency and the GIT bacterial populations from these three locations. Twenty commercial Angus steers were selected and divided into two groups according to their residual feed intake (RFI) classification determined during the feedlot-finishing period: high-RFI (n = 10) and low-RFI (n = 10). After the ruminal, cecal, and fecal samples were collected at slaughter, DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed on them to determine their bacterial composition. One-way ANOVA was performed on the animal performance data, alpha diversities, and bacterial abundances using RFI classification as the fixed effect. Overall, the ruminal bacterial population was the most different in terms of taxonomic profile compared with the cecal and fecal populations as revealed by beta diversity analysis (P < 0.001). Moreover, bacterial richness (Chao1) was greatest (P = 0.01) in the rumen of the high-RFI group compared with the low-RFI group. In contrast, bacterial richness and diversity in the intestinal environment showed that Chao1 was greater (P = 0.01) in the cecum, and the Shannon diversity index was greater in both the cecum and feces of low-RFI compared with high-RFI steers (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Ruminococcaceae was more abundant in the low-RFI group in the cecum and feces (P = 0.01); fecal Bifidobacteriaceae was more abundant in high-RFI steers (P = 0.03). No correlations (P ≥ 0.13) between any ruminal bacterial family and RFI were detected; however, Ruminococcaceae, Mogibacteriaceae, Christensenellaceae, and BS11 were negatively correlated with RFI (P < 0.05) in the cecum and feces. Succinivibrionaceae in the cecum was positively correlated with RFI (P = 0.05), and fecal Bifidobacteriaceae was positively correlated with RFI (P = 0.03). Results collectively indicate that in addition to the ruminal bacteria, the lower gut bacterial population has a significant impact on feed efficiency and nutrient utilization in feedlot steers; therefore, the intestinal bacteria should also be considered when examining the basis of ruminant feed efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.