Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32687145›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Strengthening national nutrition research: rationale and options for a new coordinated federal research effort and authority.

Sheila E Fleischhacker, Catherine E Woteki, Paul M Coates, Van S Hubbard, Grace E Flaherty, Daniel R Glickman, Thomas R Harkin, David Kessler, William W Li, Joseph Loscalzo and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Food Rx: Integrating horticulture research to improve nutrition and health.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Chemical Complexity of Food and Implications for Therapeutics.The New England journal of medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Trends and Disparities in Cardiometabolic Health Among U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Perspective: Obesity-an unexplained epidemic.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Sheila E FleischhackerFly Health, LLC and Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Catherine E WotekiUniversity of Virginia Biocomplexity Institute and Initiative, Arlington, VA, USA.
Paul M CoatesRetired, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Van S HubbardRetired, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Grace E FlahertyGerald J and Dorothy R Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Daniel R GlickmanThe Aspen Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Thomas R HarkinRetired US Senator, Des Moines, IA, USA.
David KesslerFormer Food and Drug Administration Commissioner, College Park, MD, USA.
William W LiThe Angiogenesis Foundation, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Joseph LoscalzoDepartment of Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Anand ParekhBipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Sylvia RoweSR Strategy, Washington, DC, USA.
Patrick J StoverTexas A&M AgriLife, Texas A&M College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX, USA.
Angie TagtowÄkta Strategies LLC, Des Moines, IA, USA.
Anthony Joon YunYun Family Foundation, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Dariush MozaffarianGerald J and Dorothy R Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USTufts University · USAngiogenesis Foundation · USAspen Institute · USBiocom · USBipartisan Policy Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGeorgetown University · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US faces remarkable food and nutrition challenges. A new federal effort to strengthen and coordinate nutrition research could rapidly generate the evidence base needed to address these multiple national challenges. However, the relevant characteristics of such an effort have been uncertain.

objectivesOur aim was to provide an objective, informative summary of 1) the mounting diet-related health burdens facing our nation and corresponding economic, health equity, national security, and sustainability implications; 2) the current federal nutrition research landscape and existing mechanisms for its coordination; 3) the opportunities for and potential impact of new fundamental, clinical, public health, food and agricultural, and translational scientific discoveries; and 4) the various options for further strengthening and coordinating federal nutrition research, including corresponding advantages, disadvantages, and potential executive and legislative considerations.

methodsWe reviewed government and other published documents on federal nutrition research; held various discussions with expert groups, advocacy organizations, and scientific societies; and held in-person or phone meetings with >50 federal staff in executive and legislative roles, as well as with a variety of other stakeholders in academic, industry, and nongovernment organizations.

resultsStark national nutrition challenges were identified. More Americans are sick than are healthy, largely from rising diet-related illnesses. These conditions create tremendous strains on productivity, health care costs, health disparities, government budgets, US economic competitiveness, and military readiness. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has further laid bare these strains, including food insecurity, major diet-related comorbidities for poor outcomes from COVID-19 such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, and insufficient surveillance on and coordination of our food system. More than 10 federal departments and agencies currently invest in critical nutrition research, yet with relatively flat investments over several decades. Coordination also remains suboptimal, documented by multiple governmental reports over 50 years. Greater harmonization and expansion of federal investment in nutrition science, not a silo-ing or rearrangement of existing investments, has tremendous potential to generate new discoveries to improve and sustain the health of all Americans. Two identified key strategies to achieve this were as follows: 1) a new authority for robust cross-governmental coordination of nutrition research and other nutrition-related policy and 2) strengthened authority, investment, and coordination for nutrition research within the NIH. These strategies were found to be complementary, together catalyzing important new science, partnerships, coordination, and returns on investment. Additional complementary actions to accelerate federal nutrition research were identified at the USDA.

conclusionsThe need and opportunities for strengthened federal nutrition research are clear, with specific identified options to help create the new leadership, strategic planning, coordination, and investment the nation requires to address the multiple nutrition-related challenges and grasp the opportunities before us.

Indexed as

Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaCoronavirus InfectionsCost of IllnessCOVID-19Health Care CostsHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMilitary PersonnelNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Nutrition DisordersPandemicsPneumonia, ViralResearchUnited StatesUnited States Department of AgricultureUnited States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesdietDietary Guidelines for AmericansDietary Reference Intakesfederal nutrition researchnutritionpolicypreventionresearch

Identifiers

PMID32687145
PMCPMC7454258
OpenAlexW3044925156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.