Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32686988›Full record

ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2020

The effect of non-communicative eye movements on joint attention.

Nathan Caruana, Ayeh Alhasan, Kirilee Wagner, David M Kaplan, Alexandra Woolgar, Genevieve McArthur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan CaruanaDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9676-814X
Ayeh AlhasanDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kirilee WagnerDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David M KaplanDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alexandra WoolgarPerception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Genevieve McArthurDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye movements provide important signals for joint attention. However, those eye movements that indicate bids for joint attention often occur among non-communicative eye movements. This study investigated the influence of these non-communicative eye movements on subsequent joint attention responsivity. Participants played an interactive game with an avatar which required both players to search for a visual target on a screen. The player who discovered the target used their eyes to initiate joint attention. We compared participants' saccadic reaction times (SRTs) to the avatar's joint attention bids when they were preceded by non-communicative eye movements that predicted the location of the target (Predictive Search), did not predict the location of the target (Random Search), and when there were no non-communicative eye gaze movements prior to joint attention (No Search). We also included a control condition in which participants completed the same task, but responded to a dynamic arrow stimulus instead of the avatar's eye movements. For both

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsCuesFixation, OcularHumansReaction Timeeye gazeeye trackingJoint attentionsocial cognitionsocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID32686988
PMCPMC7672778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.