Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32686915›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Haploidentical related donor vs matched sibling donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome aged over 50 years: A single-center retrospective study.

Jiafu Huang, Fen Huang, Zhiping Fan, Na Xu, Li Xuan, Hui Liu, Pengcheng Shi, Ling Jiang, Yu Zhang, Jing Sun and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Haploidentical donorChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of haploidentical-related donorChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiafu HuangDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fen HuangDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiping FanDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Na XuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Li XuanDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6176-7411
Hui LiuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Pengcheng ShiDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ling JiangDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing SunDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qifa LiuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4015-3952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative therapeutic option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Increasing data suggest that haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation achieve comparable outcomes with HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) in adult AML/MDS. This retrospective study compared the outcomes of AML or MDS patients age ≥50 years underwent HID and MSD transplantation. One hundred and fifty-six patients were enrolled in this study, including 75 HID and 81 MSD transplantation. The 100-day cumulative incidence of II-IV° acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 33.3 ± 5.4% vs 22.2 ± 4.6%, respectively, in HID and MSD groups (P = .066), and III-IV° acute GVHD was not significantly different between two groups (5.3%±2.6% vs 6.2%±2.7%, respectively, P = .823). The 2-year cumulative incidence of limited and extensive chronic GVHD was not statistically different in HID and MSD groups (20.9 ± 5.5% vs 18.9 ± 4.8% and 13.0 ± 4.7% vs 19.7 ± 5.0%, P = .889 and P = .269, respectively). The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse (27.0 ± 5.6% vs 22.7 ± 5.1%, P = .509), 2-year overall survival (63.0 ± 5.8% vs 66.7 ± 5.4%, P = .454), 2-year transplant-related mortality (17.2 ± 4.6% vs 17.4 ± 4.4%, P = .847), 2-year progression-free survival (59.3 ± 5.8% vs 64.5 ± 5.4%, P = .437), 2-year GVHD-free relapse-free survival (42.6 ± 5.9% vs 40.9 ± 5.6%, P = .964) were not significantly different in the two groups. The present data showed equivalent outcomes in AML or MDS patients age ≥50 years underwent HID and MSD transplantation.

Indexed as

SiblingsAcute DiseaseAgedAge FactorsCause of DeathChronic DiseaseFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHistocompatibilityHumansIncidenceLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic Syndromesacute myeloid leukemiaallogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationelderlyhaploidentical related donormatched sibling donormyelodysplastic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32686915
PMCPMC7476836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.