Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32686898›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2020

Combining statistical shape modeling, CFD, and meta-modeling to approximate the patient-specific pressure-drop across the aortic valve in real-time.

M J M M Hoeijmakers, I Waechter-Stehle, J Weese, F N Van de Vosse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Novel Attention-based Network for Geometry Reconstruction with Error Estimation from Medical Images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Euclidean and Shape-Based Analysis of the Dynamic Mitral Annulus in Children using a Novel Open-Source Framework.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The impact of shape uncertainty on aortic-valve pressure-drop computations.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  14. Data-driven cardiovascular flow modelling: examples and opportunities.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M J M M HoeijmakersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9942-7597
I Waechter-StehlePhilips Research, Hamburg, Germany.
J WeesePhilips Research, Hamburg, Germany.
F N Van de VosseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in medical imaging, segmentation techniques, and high performance computing have stimulated the use of complex, patient-specific, three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Patient-specific, CFD-compatible geometries of the aortic valve are readily obtained. CFD can then be used to obtain the patient-specific pressure-flow relationship of the aortic valve. However, such CFD simulations are computationally expensive, and real-time alternatives are desired.

aimThe aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of a meta-model with respect to high-fidelity, three-dimensional CFD simulations of the aortic valve.

methodsPrincipal component analysis was used to build a statistical shape model (SSM) from a population of 74 iso-topological meshes of the aortic valve. Synthetic meshes were created with the SSM, and steady-state CFD simulations at flow-rates between 50 and 650 mL/s were performed to build a meta-model. The meta-model related the statistical shape variance, and flow-rate to the pressure-drop.

resultsEven though the first three shape modes account for only 46% of shape variance, the features relevant for the pressure-drop seem to be captured. The three-mode shape-model approximates the pressure-drop with an average error of 8.8% to 10.6% for aortic valves with a geometric orifice area below 150 mm

conclusionsStatistical shape modeling can be used to capture shape variation of the aortic valve. Meta-models trained by SSM-based CFD simulations can provide an estimate of the pressure-flow relationship in real-time.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisHemodynamicsHumansHydrodynamicsModels, Cardiovascularaortic valve stenosiscomputational fluid dynamicsheart valve diseasemeta-modelingstatistical shape modeling

Identifiers

PMID32686898
PMCPMC7583374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.