Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32686846›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2021

Bayesian compositional regression with structured priors for microbiome feature selection.

Liangliang Zhang, Yushu Shi, Robert R Jenq, Kim-Anh Do, Christine B Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Constructing phylogenetic trees for microbiome data analysis: A mini-review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Analysis of Microbiome Data.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Sparse tree-based clustering of microbiome data to characterize microbiome heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liangliang ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-2260
Yushu ShiDepartment of Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-7575-9706
Robert R JenqDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-5434-439X
Kim-Anh DoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Christine B PetersonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-3316-0468

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting Tumor Microenvironment-Induced Therapy Resistance in Prostate Cancer Bone MetastasisP50CA140388 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LOGOTHETIS, CHRISTOPHER J., THOMPSON, TIMOTHY CHARLES · 2009 to 2022
$23.4M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Protecting colonic mucus to mitigate acute intestinal graft-versus-host diseaseR01HL124112 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JENQ, ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$6.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140388NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL124112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiome plays a critical role in human health and disease, and there is a strong scientific interest in linking specific features of the microbiome to clinical outcomes. There are key aspects of microbiome data, however, that limit the applicability of standard variable selection methods. In particular, the observed data are compositional, as the counts within each sample have a fixed-sum constraint. In addition, microbiome features, typically quantified as operational taxonomic units, often reflect microorganisms that are similar in function, and may therefore have a similar influence on the response variable. To address the challenges posed by these aspects of the data structure, we propose a variable selection technique with the following novel features: a generalized transformation and z-prior to handle the compositional constraint, and an Ising prior that encourages the joint selection of microbiome features that are closely related in terms of their genetic sequence similarity. We demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms existing penalized approaches for microbiome variable selection in both simulation and the analysis of real data exploring the relationship of the gut microbiome to body mass index.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansBayesian variable selectioncompositional covariatesIsing priorlinear regressionmicrobiome datazero-constrained prior

Identifiers

PMID32686846
PMCPMC8216648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.