Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32686644›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2020

Molecular identification of trypanosomes in cattle in Malawi using PCR methods and nanopore sequencing: epidemiological implications for the control of human and animal trypanosomiases.

Megasari Marsela, Kyoko Hayashida, Ryo Nakao, Elisha Chatanga, Alex Kiarie Gaithuma, Kawai Naoko, Janelisa Musaya, Chihiro Sugimoto, Junya Yamagishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular identification of new Trypanosoma evansi type non-A/B isolates from buffaloes and cattle in Indonesia.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Megasari MarselaDivision of Collaboration and Education, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-20, Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0020 Hokkaido, Japan.
Kyoko HayashidaDivision of Collaboration and Education, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-20, Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0020 Hokkaido, Japan.
Ryo NakaoLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, Hokkaido University, Kita-18, Nishi-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-0818 Hokkaido, Japan.
Elisha ChatangaLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, Hokkaido University, Kita-18, Nishi-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-0818 Hokkaido, Japan.
Alex Kiarie GaithumaDivision of Collaboration and Education, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-20, Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0020 Hokkaido, Japan.
Kawai NaokoDivision of Collaboration and Education, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-20, Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0020 Hokkaido, Japan.
Janelisa MusayaDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, P/Bag 360 Chichiri, 30096 Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Chihiro SugimotoDivision of Collaboration and Education, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-20, Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0020 Hokkaido, Japan.
Junya YamagishiDivision of Collaboration and Education, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-20, Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0020 Hokkaido, Japan - International Collaboration Unit, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-20, Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0020 Hokkaido, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify trypanosomes infecting cattle in Malawi in order to understand the importance of cattle in the transmission dynamics of Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) and Animal African Trypanosomosis (AAT). A total of 446 DNA samples from cattle blood from three regions of Malawi were screened for African trypanosomes by ITS1 PCR. The obtained amplicons were sequenced using a portable next-generation sequencer, MinION, for validation. Comparison of the results from ITS1 PCR and MinION sequencing showed that combining the two methods provided more accurate species identification than ITS1 PCR alone. Further PCR screening targeting the serum resistance-associated (SRA) gene was conducted to detect Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. Trypanosoma congolense was the most prevalent Trypanosoma sp., which was found in Nkhotakota (10.8%; 20 of 185), followed by Kasungu (2.5%; 5 of 199). Of note, the prevalence of T. b. rhodesiense detected by SRA PCR was high in Kasungu and Nkhotakota showing 9.5% (19 of 199) and 2.7% (5 of 185), respectively. We report the presence of animal African trypanosomes and T. b. rhodesiense from cattle at the human-livestock-wildlife interface for the first time in Malawi. Our results confirmed that animal trypanosomes are important causes of anemia in cattle and that cattle are potential reservoirs for human African trypanosomiasis in Malawi.

Indexed as

TrypanosomaTrypanosomiasisAnimalsCattleDNA, ProtozoanHumansMalawiNanopore SequencingPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, ProtozoanAATCattleEpidemiologyHATMalawiTrypanosome

Identifiers

PMID32686644
PMCPMC7370688
OpenAlexW3044607173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.