Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32686335›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2020

TightRope vs Clavicular Hook Plate for Rockwood III-V Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Meta-Analysis.

Xin Pan, Rui-Yan Lv, Ming-Gang Lv, Da-Guang Zhang

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative meta-analysis of TightRope vs. hook plate for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2025
    Review
  7. Cutting Through Time: A Surgical Comparison of Bosworth, LARS™, and TightRopeJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. [Comparative study on effectiveness of clavicular hook plate fixation in treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation and distal clavicle fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 3D C-arm navigated acromioclavicular joint stabilization.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Open Double-Button Technique is Superior to Hook Plate in the Treatment of Acute Rockwood Type III/V Acromioclavicular Dislocations.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin PanDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Rui-Yan LvDepartment of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Shulan City, Shulan, China.
Ming-Gang LvDepartment of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Shulan City, Shulan, China.
Da-Guang ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1602-6040

Funding

Jilin Province
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess and compare the clinical outcomes and complications of TightRope® fixation vs hook plate fixation for the treatment of Rockwood III-VI Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations.

methodsRelevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, from their inception to 12 April, 2019. The main outcomes of interest included Constant Score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and complications. Weight mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs was used to calculate the data.

resultsFour studies with a total of 179 patients were included in this study. Compared with hook plate, TightRope® fixation was associated with a significantly less VAS score for pain (WMD = -0.69, 95% CI: -1.10, -0.27; P = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two surgical techniques in terms of Constant Score (WMD = 6.12, 95% CI: -3.84, 16.08; P = 0.229), UCLA (WMD = 7.96, 95% CI: -5.76, 21.68; P = 0.256), CCD (WMD = 0.24, 95% CI: -0.67, 1.15; P = 0.602), and complication rate.

conclusionBoth TightRope® and hook plate techniques offered effective outcomes in relieving the pain of dislocation and improving function of ACJ. However, TightRope® fixation showed an advantage over hook plate in terms of postoperative pain. Further larger-scale RCTs are needed to verify our findings.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesAcromioclavicular JointHumansJoint DislocationsOrthopedic ProceduresPain MeasurementSuture TechniquesAcromioclavicular dislocationsHook plate fixationMeta-analysisTightRope® fixation

Identifiers

PMID32686335
PMCPMC7454145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.