Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32685940›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2020

Checklist Design Reconsidered: Understanding Checklist Compliance and Timing of Interactions.

Leah Kulp, Aleksandra Sarcevic, Yinan Zheng, Megan Cheng, Emily Alberto, Randall Burd

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Transitioning Cognitive Aids into Decision Support Platforms: Requirements and Design Guidelines.ACM transactions on computer-human interaction : a publication of the Association for Computing Machinery · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Design of Streaming Data Interfaces for Emergency Medical Contexts.Extended abstracts of MobileHCi 2021: the ACM International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction : mobile apart, mobile together : September 27-Oct. 01, Toulouse. MobileHCI (Conference) (23rd : 2021 : Online) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Digital Cognitive Aids to Support Adaptation of Surgical Processes to COVID-19 Protective Policies.IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah KulpDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Aleksandra SarcevicDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yinan ZhengChildren's National Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Megan ChengChildren's National Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Emily AlbertoChildren's National Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Randall BurdChildren's National Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Children's National · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Intention-aware Recommender System for Improving Trauma Resuscitation OutcomesR01LM011834 · NLM · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BURD, RANDALL S., MARSIC, IVAN · 2014 to 2023
$4.7M
Analysis of Factors Associated with Clinical Checklist ComplianceR03HS026057 · AHRQ · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI SARCEVIC, ALEKSANDRA · 2018 to 2019
$100k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS026057NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the association between user interactions with a checklist and task performance in a time-critical medical setting. By comparing 98 logs from a digital checklist for trauma resuscitation with activity logs generated by video review, we identified three non-compliant checklist use behaviors: failure to check items for completed tasks, falsely checking items when tasks were not performed, and inaccurately checking items for incomplete tasks. Using video review, we found that user perceptions of task completion were often misaligned with clinical practices that guided activity coding, thereby contributing to non-compliant check-offs. Our analysis of associations between different contexts and the timing of check-offs showed longer delays when (1) checklist users were absent during patient arrival, (2) patients had penetrating injuries, and (3) resuscitations were assigned to the highest acuity. We discuss opportunities for reconsidering checklist designs to reduce non-compliant checklist use.

Indexed as

Checklist designdynamic checklistmedical checklistmixed methodstrauma resuscitationvideo review

Identifiers

PMID32685940
PMCPMC7368994
OpenAlexW3032349771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.