ArticleContraception: X2020
A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial.
Article in Contraception: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of nonoxynol-9 (N-9) on sperm functions: systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproduction & fertility · 2022Pooled it
- First-in-line 3D-printed intravaginal ring for nonhormonal contraception.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- On-demand self-care products: a systematic scoping review of user perspectives.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- First-in-line 3D-printed intravaginal ring for nonhormonal contraception.Research square · 2025Article
- A prodrug strategy for sustained release of lactic acid from silicone elastomer vaginal rings.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Non-hormonal Contraception: Current and Emerging Targets.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Reversible female contraceptives: historical, current, and future perspectives†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Review
- Contraception in Medically Complex Adolescents and Young Adults.Open access journal of contraception · 2024Article
- Non-Hormonal Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- A brief history and future prospects of contraception.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- New Contraception Update - Annovera, Phexxi, Slynd, and Twirla.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2022Article
- The therapeutic importance of acid-base balance.Biochemical pharmacology · 2021Review
- Mechanisms of action of currently available woman-controlled, vaginally administered, non-hormonal contraceptive products.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective was to evaluate the contraceptive effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a novel vaginal pH regulator over seven cycles of use. STUDY
designA single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted across 112 sites in the United States in sexually active 18-35-year-old women at risk of pregnancy. Women administered the study treatment ≤ 1 h before each episode of intercourse. Women recorded use of study drug, coital information, and any symptoms experienced in electronic diaries. The primary outcome was the seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy rate as calculated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology; secondary outcomes included safety. Overall satisfaction was assessed via written questionnaires.
resultsA total of 1384 women were enrolled in the study from July 2017 to November 2018. Mean age was 27.7 ± 4.4 years; most women were white (69.0%). The seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy percentage was 13.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.0%-17.5%], meeting the prespecified primary endpoint of having the upper bound 95% CI ≤ 21%. Most common adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥ 2% of women were vulvovaginal burning sensation, vulvovaginal pruritus, urinary tract infection, vulvovaginal pain, mycotic infection, bacterial vaginosis, and nasopharyngitis. Of 1330 women who used the study drug at least once, fewer than 2% of women discontinued due to any AEs, and < 1% of women discontinued due to genitourinary symptoms. Overall, > 80% of women reported being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with study treatment.
conclusionsIn this phase 3 study, the novel vaginal pH regulator demonstrated 86.3% contraceptive effectiveness, was safe and well tolerated, and was highly acceptable. IMPLICATIONS: This novel vaginal pH regulator is a safe, nonhormonal, woman-controlled method of contraception that expands women's options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.