ReviewRomanian journal of ophthalmology
Evaluating glaucoma surgeries in the MIGS context.
Review in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of surgical outcomes of suture gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy versus excisional goniotomy with Kahook dual blade at 12 months.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Precision Glaucoma Surgery: A Mechanism-Based Review of MIGS and Contemporary Surgical Pathways.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Juvenile open-angle glaucoma: a clinicopathological update and review.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Five-year results of illuminated microcatheter-assisted gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in the Indian population - A retrospective study.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of the novel MIGS implant Wistend compared to Kahook Dual Blade in the treatment of experimental ocular hypertension in rabbits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Current perspectives in tackling glaucoma blindness.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Trabeculectomy and Predictors of Success in Patients of African Ancestry With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.Journal of glaucoma · 2025Article
- Review
- The Evolution and Current Landscape of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries: A Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Glaucoma: Novel antifibrotic therapeutics for the trabecular meshwork.European journal of pharmacology · 2023Review
- Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Review of the Literature.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The PreserFlo MicroShunt in the Context of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Review of glaucoma medication adherence monitoring in the digital health era.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Preventing Blindness with Early Cataract Surgery and Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery in Patients Over 50: Guidance for Patients, Physicians and World Governments in Dealing with Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- XEN Gel Stent Implantation in Eyes With Previous Glaucoma Filtering Surgeries: A Case Series.Cureus · 2022Article
- Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for congenital glaucoma secondary to Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome: A case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022Article
- XEN Glaucoma Implant for the Management of Glaucoma in Naïve Patients versus Patients with Previous Glaucoma Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Initial experience with phacoemulsification and goniotomy using the Kahook dual blade in advanced open-angle glaucoma: Six-month outcomes in Indian eyes.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- XEN Glaucoma Implant for the Management of Operated Uncontrolled Glaucoma: Results and Complications during a Long-Term Follow-Up.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Young glaucoma specialist practice patterns: Why do you do what you do?Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The challenges of glaucoma management are many: the disease is chronic, progressive, often asymptomatic, and very often, the quality of life and costs of treatment is unacceptable to the patient. This is true for both medical therapy and conventional glaucoma surgery. The choice of therapy, especially the transition from the former to the latter, is now being bridged by Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries (MIGS). Choosing from the several options now available in the surgical armamentarium requires a deeper understanding of the available modalities. This review aims to provide an overview of the decision-making process, keeping in mind age, type of glaucoma, life expectancy, socioeconomic status, patient expectations, and coexisting cataract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32685772PMC7339697W3040483977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.