Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32685770›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in systems biology2019

Footprint-based functional analysis of multiomic data.

Aurelien Dugourd, Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in systems biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A gene expression atlas of a juvenile nervous system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Multi-omic network inference from time-series data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aurelien DugourdHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute of Computational Biomedicine, Bioquant, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Julio Saez-RodriguezHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute of Computational Biomedicine, Bioquant, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omic technologies allow us to generate extensive data, including transcriptomic, proteomic, phosphoproteomic and metabolomic. These data can be used to study signal transduction, gene regulation and metabolism. In this review, we summarise resources and methods to analysis these types of data. We focus on methods developed to recover functional insights using footprints. Footprints are signatures defined by the effect of molecules or processes of interest. They integrate information from multiple measurements whose abundances are under the influence of a common regulator. For example, transcripts controlled by a transcription factor or peptides phosphorylated by a kinase. Footprints can also be generalised across multiple types of omic data. Thus, we also present methods to integrate multiple types of omic data and features (such as the ones derived from footprints) together. We highlight some examples of studies that leverage such approaches to discover new biological mechanisms.

Indexed as

Data analysisFootprintFunctionalIntegrationMechanisticMetabolomicsMulti-omicsPhosphoproteomicsProteomicsTranscriptomicsTrans-omics

Identifiers

PMID32685770
PMCPMC7357600
OpenAlexW2935426292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.