Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32685748›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT2019

Psychosocial factors at work and stress among the nursing staff of a central sterile services department.

Paula Caroline Guissi, Maria Amélia Stefanutto Zihlmann Pinho, Israel Vieira, Fidelis Ranali, Daniela de Almeida Martins, Marcia Cristina das Dores Bandini, Sergio Roberto de-Lucca

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula Caroline GuissiSchool of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas School of Medical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas Brazil.
Maria Amélia Stefanutto Zihlmann PinhoOccupational Health Division, Human Resources Department, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas Occupational Health Division Human Resources Department Universidade Estadual de Campinas Brazil.
Israel VieiraOccupational Health Division, Human Resources Department, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas Occupational Health Division Human Resources Department Universidade Estadual de Campinas Brazil.
Fidelis RanaliOccupational Health Division, Human Resources Department, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas Occupational Health Division Human Resources Department Universidade Estadual de Campinas Brazil.
Daniela de Almeida MartinsOccupational Health Division, Human Resources Department, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas Occupational Health Division Human Resources Department Universidade Estadual de Campinas Brazil.
Marcia Cristina das Dores BandiniSchool of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas School of Medical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas Brazil.
Sergio Roberto de-LuccaSchool of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Campinas (SP), Brazil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas School of Medical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe international literature points out an association between stress and psychosocial factors at work (PFW) in different occupational groups. Among health care workers, providing direct patient care might be rewarding or contribute to cause stress, and central sterile services departments (CSSD) provide relevant support to in-hospital care.

objectiveTo investigate PFW liable to cause stress among the nursing staff of a university hospital CSSD.

methodsQuantitative and qualitative study of a non-probabilistic sample of 63 workers who responded a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) scale. Fifty-one participants were also subjected to individual interviews, which were recorded, transcribed and subjected to content analysis, resulting in thematic matrices and categories.

resultsThe sample mainly comprised women (92%) and was aged 45 years old, on average. Effort-reward imbalance was found for 16% of the participants. Working conditions, equipment and materials, relationship among coworkers, and management support were listed as factors related to job satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Lack of peer recognition was described as the main factor associated with dissatisfaction and stress.

conclusionCSSD workers feel they are stigmatized and underestimated by their coworkers involved in direct patient care and the institution as a whole. Recognition of the work done is fundamental for job satisfaction and health protection and preservation.

Indexed as

hospital servicesnurse practitionersoccupational stress

Identifiers

PMID32685748
PMCPMC7363270
OpenAlexW3012251976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.