ReviewWellcome open research2020
What is the functional/organic distinction actually doing in psychiatry and neurology?
Review in Wellcome open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The role of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in determining the aetiology of psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.Schizophrenia research · 2025Pooled it
- Factors associated with receiving a Functional Disorder diagnostic label: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Relearning the epistemology, history, and future of neuropsychiatry.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Unraveling functional neurological disorder in pediatric populations: A systematic review of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- Genome-wide study of somatic symptom and related disorders identifies novel genomic loci and map genetic architecture.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- The Inflammatory Nexus: Unraveling Shared Pathways and Promising Treatments in Alzheimer's Disease and Schizophrenia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Psychiatric Camouflage: A Case Series.Cureus · 2024Article
- Psychopathology of organic brain disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- 'Functional hyperthermia': a historical overview.BioPsychoSocial medicine · 2023Article
- Nonorganic (Behavioral) Signs and Their Association With Epidural Corticosteroid Injection Treatment Outcomes and Psychiatric Comorbidity in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Multicenter Study.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2023Article
- The role of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in determining the aetiology of catatonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Interpretable deep learning of myelin histopathology in age-related cognitive impairment.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2022Article
- Magical thinking and moral injury: exclusion culture in psychiatry.BJPsych bulletin · 2022Review
- Actualities in immunological markers and electrochemical sensors for determination of dopamine and its metabolites in psychotic disorders (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The functional-organic distinction aims to distinguish symptoms, signs, and syndromes that can be explained by diagnosable biological changes, from those that cannot. The distinction is central to clinical practice and is a key organising principle in diagnostic systems. Following a pragmatist approach that examines meaning through use, we examine how the functional-organic distinction is deployed and conceptualised in psychiatry and neurology. We note that the conceptual scope of the terms 'functional' and 'organic' varies considerably by context. Techniques for differentially diagnosing 'functional' and 'organic' diverge in the strength of evidence they produce as a necessary function of the syndrome in question. Clinicians do not agree on the meaning of the terms and report using them strategically. The distinction often relies on an implied model of 'zero sum' causality and encourages classification of syndromes into discrete 'functional' and 'organic' versions. Although this clearly applies in some instances, this is often in contrast to our best scientific understanding of neuropsychiatric disorders as arising from a dynamic interaction between personal, social and neuropathological factors. We also note 'functional' and 'organic' have loaded social meanings, creating the potential for social disempowerment. Given this, we argue for a better understanding of how strategic simplification and complex scientific reality limit each other in neuropsychiatric thinking. We also note that the contribution of people who experience the interaction between 'functional' and 'organic' factors has rarely informed the validity of this distinction and the dilemmas arising from it, and we highlight this as a research priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.