Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32685635›Full record

ArticleData in brief2020

Summary data of home proximity to the nearest greenhouse (floricultural) crops and areas of greenhouse crops around various distances from homes in agricultural settings in Ecuador.

Noor Nazeeh, José R Suárez-López

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noor NazeehDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
José R Suárez-LópezDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego. 9500 Gilman Drive #0725, La Jolla, CA 92093-0725, USA.
Loma Linda University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

The ESPINA Study Follow-up Examination in 2016: Environmental Pollutants and Child/Adolescent DevelopmentR01ES025792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Raeanne Cristine Moore, Jose Ricardo Suarez · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
Pesticides and Mental Health among Adolescents in Ecuadorian Agricultural CommunitiesR21ES026084 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SUAREZ, JOSE RICARDO · 2015 to 2016
$344k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025792NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES026084NIOSH CDC HHS R36 OH009402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents data of 623 children (1156 observations) between 4 and 17 years of age living in floricultural communities of Ecuador from 3 examination periods (2008, Apr 2016, and Jul-Oct 2016) as part of the study of Secondary Exposure to Pesticides among Children and Adolescents (ESPINA).We present geospatial data of residential distance to the nearest greenhouse crop and areas within various buffer sizes around homes of participants which is data used in the original research article: Suarez-Lopez JR, et al. "Residential proximity to greenhouse crops and pesticide exposure (via acetylcholinesterase activity) assessed from childhood through adolescence". These geospatial variables are related but different constructs of the potential for off-target drift of pesticides from crops onto homes nearby (via acetylcholinesterase activity) Understanding the associations between these distance and crop area variables is important as a growing number of investigations are using these constructs of off-target pesticide drift to characterize their associations with both exposure biomarkers and outcome measures. Geographic positioning of greenhouses and homes were obtained using GPS receivers and satellite imagery. Distances between homes and the nearest greenhouse edge, and areas of greenhouse crops within various buffer zones (0-150 m, 151-300 m, 310-500 m, 501-750 m, and 751-1000 m) around homes were calculated using Geographic Information System software. Beyond the dataset, we present demographic and anthropometric characteristics, and indicators of pesticide exposure of participants across categories of areas of greenhouse crops around homes for buffer sizes of 0-150 m around homes. We also present the distribution of areas of flower crops within various buffer zone sizes around children's homes and the correlation coefficients between household proximity to the nearest treated greenhouse crops and areas of flower crops within various buffer zones within 1000 m of homes.

Indexed as

ChildrenGeospatialPesticide driftResidential proximity

Identifiers

PMID32685635
PMCPMC7358380
OpenAlexW3039182240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.