Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32685590›Full record

ArticleJournal of health economics and outcomes research2019

Healthcare Utilization, Costs of Care, and Mortality Among Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Hiangkiat Tan, Tao Gu, Er Chen, Rajeshwari Punekar, Perry B Shieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health economics and outcomes research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Costs of Illness of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Economic burden of spinal muscular atrophy: an analysis of claims data.Journal of market access & health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiangkiat TanInstitution: HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE.
Tao GuInstitution: HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE.
Er ChenInstitution: Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Rajeshwari PunekarInstitution: HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE.
Perry B ShiehInstitution: Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs of care among patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Methods: SMA patients were identified from a large managed care population using administrative claims data from January 2006 to March 2016. Patients were classified into infantile, childhood-onset, and late-onset groups based on age of first SMA diagnosis. They were matched 1:1 to non-SMA patients based on age, gender, geography, and health plan type.

resultsIn the infantile group, 17.4% and 26.1% were treated with invasive and non-invasive ventilation, respectively. Uses of orthotics/orthoses and orthopedic surgery were frequent: 54.5% and 22.7% childhood group; 27.0% and 38.5% late-onset group. Mean per member per month costs in SMA vs. matched non-SMA patients was $25,517 vs. $406 (infantile); $6,357 vs. $188 (childhood-onset); $2,499 vs. $742 (late-onset).

conclusionsSMA patients, particularly with infantile onset, incurred significantly higher healthcare utilization and costs than the general population.

Indexed as

costs of carehealthcare resource utilizationmortalityspinal muscular atrophytreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID32685590
PMCPMC7299449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.