Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32685539›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Current Trends in Research on Bone Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Xin Huang, Xu Liu, Yuli Shang, Feng Qiao, Gang Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Bibliometric Analysis of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Dentistry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Unraveling the publication trends in inhalable nano-systems.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin HuangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0893-7661
Xu LiuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0872-7007
Yuli ShangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8433-0909
Feng QiaoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9560-9913
Tianjin Stomatological Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone regeneration is a frequent research topic in clinical studies, but macroscopic studies on the clinical application of bone regeneration are rare. We conducted a bibliometric analysis, using international databases, to explore the clinical application and mechanism of bone regeneration, to highlight the relevant research hotspots and prospects.

resultsEighty-nine high-frequency major MeSH terms were obtained from 10237 articles and were divided into 5 clusters. We generated a network visualization map, an overlay visualization mountain map, and a social network diagram. Then, the MeSH terms were subdivided into 7 categories according to each diagram; current research hotspots were identified as scaffold, drug effect, osseointegration in dental implant, guided bone regeneration, factors impacting bone regeneration, treatment of bone and tissue loss, and bone regeneration in dental implants.

conclusionBICOMB, VOSviewer, and other bibliometric tools revealed that dental implants, scaffolds, and factors impacting bone regeneration are hot research topics, while scaffolds also hold promise from the perspective of bone tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBone RegenerationAnimalsBiomedical ResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID32685539
PMCPMC7273498
OpenAlexW3029866492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.