ArticleBioMed research international2020
Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retracted:BioMed research international · 2024Article
- Review
- Cajal bodies: Evolutionarily conserved nuclear biomolecular condensates with properties unique to plants.The Plant cell · 2023Review
- Insights Into the Effect of Rice Stripe Virus P2 on Rice Defense by Comparative Proteomic Analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- The Bunyavirales: The Plant-Infecting Counterparts.Viruses · 2021Review
- ATG8-Interacting Motif: Evolution and Function in Selective Autophagy of Targeting Biological Processes.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-03-20Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- RetractedRetracted:2024
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
p2 of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.