ArticleGlobal advances in health and medicine2020
Mindfulness as Relational: Participants' Experience of Mindfulness-based Programs Are Critical to Fidelity Assessments.
Article in Global advances in health and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging traditions: a template analysis of Buddhist and Western psychological approaches to mindfulness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Mindfulness-based interventions: what more can the West learn from Buddhism? A fieldwork study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The Necessary Thread of Mindfulness Intervention Fidelity Assurance: Enabling an Organizational Strategy to Promote Health Care Professional Well-Being.Global advances in health and medicine · 2021Article
- Intervention Fidelity in Mindfulness-Based Research and Practice: Overview of the Special Collection and State of the Field.Global advances in integrative medicine and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mindfulness outcome research has been criticized for issues in research design, precision of outcome measures, and reporting overoptimistically their power to effect change. Although mindfulness programs are a complex interaction of teachers, teachings, and participants, it is of some concern that current assessments of program fidelity focus primarily on teacher skills and program content delivery. Although ensuring that teachers are trained to criteria and adhere to program elements, the participants' engagement, a critical parameter contributing to outcomes of mindfulness programs, has been neglected. Furthermore, the assessment measures are primarily actuarial even when assessing experiential or difficult-to-define aspects of teacher-participant interactions. The inclusion of the participants' experience of the program as a component of fidelity assessments creates several opportunities to deepen our understanding of how mindfulness impacts the lives of practitioners. By investigating the teacher-participant relationship, determining how participants process the core elements, and exploring the implementation of the practices in their lives, a more nuanced understanding of the capacity of mindfulness-based programs to effect positive change may be possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.