ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2020
Comparative study of gene expression profiles rooted in acute myocardial infarction and ischemic/reperfusion rat models.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Transcriptomic Analysis of Smoking-Induced Gene Expression Alterations in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- The role of macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1) in inflammatory disorders and cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Discovering Cerebral Ischemic Stroke Associated Genes Based on Network Representation Learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mining data in depth of genome-wide sequencing data generated from pathological target tissues under disease conditions is necessary for seeking novel functional genes, and developing more biological study directions for the field. Based on our previous published RNA-seq data generated from acute myocardial ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion in rat heart, we re-analysed these two data sets using bioinformatics tools. All these raw fastq files were extracted from Illumina BCL using the Illumina CASAVA program. Four groups were obtained: UD (genes up-regulated in MI but down-regulated in I/R injury), DU (genes down-regulated in MI but up-regulated in I/R injury), UU (genes both up-regulated in MI and I/R injury), and DD (genes both down-regulated in MI and I/R injury) groups. The results showed that 304 common genes in the UD group, 236 common genes in the DU group, 318 common genes in the UU group, and 159 common genes in the DD group detected by comparing data sets of the MI and the I/R injury. We then listed the top 30 DEGs for each group, and carried out GO and KEGG analyses for enrichment and pathway studies for those top expressed genes. Further analysis of INTERPRO Protein Domains and Features enriched by DEGs showed that 20% of the Domains enriched were related to c-type lectin, and 17% of these domains are related to neurotransmitter-gated ion-channel. 15% of PFAM Protein Domains were about Neurotransmitter-gated ion-channel. There were only 8 SMART Protein Domains DEGs enriched and 37.5% of which were concerned about leucine-rich. Collagen involvement in Reactome Pathways accounted for 22.7%. We found that only a few DEGs in these two disease conditions have been reported in the literatures, suggesting that there are many new genes would be considered in the future studies. These analyses would provide some information for seeking more novel targets of these two clinic diseases, acute myocardial ischemia and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32685266PMC7364282W3044950199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.