ReviewAmerican journal of blood research2020
Cell-free DNA for genomic profiling and minimal residual disease monitoring in Myeloma- are we there yet?
Review in American journal of blood research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Dynamic Targetable Extracellular Vesicle Surface Proteins Monitor Depth of Response to CAR T Therapy.Research square · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based non-invasive profiling of tumor transcriptomes from cell-free DNA for precision oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Prevalence, detection, and clinical implications of BRAF V600E and NRAS Q61R mutations in multiple myeloma BM-FFPE tissues using digital droplet PCR.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
- High level of circulating cell-free tumor DNA at diagnosis correlates with disease spreading and defines multiple myeloma patients with poor prognosis.Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
- Emerging role of non-invasive and liquid biopsy biomarkers in pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Integrated analysis of circulating cell free nucleic acids for cancer genotyping and immune phenotyping of tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Current and Future Perspectives of Cell-Free DNA in Liquid Biopsy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
- Nucleic acid liquid biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: current state, challenges, and opportunities.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Implementation of Next Generation Sequencing-Based Liquid Biopsy for Clinical Molecular Diagnostics in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Review
- Leapfrogging laboratories: the promise and pitfalls of high-tech solutions for antimicrobial resistance surveillance in low-income settings.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Real-Time Molecular Monitoring in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Circulating Tumor DNA.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMultiple myeloma (MM), a plasma cell neoplasm, afflicts elder individuals accounting for 10% of hematologic malignancies. The MM plasma cells largely reside within the bone marrow niche and are accessible through an invasive bone marrow biopsy, which is challenging during serial monitoring of patients. In this setting, cell free DNA (cfDNA) may have a role to ascertain the molecular aberrations at diagnosis and in assessment of residual disease during therapy. The aim of this review was to explore the utility and current status of cfDNA in MM.
methodPubMed was searched with terms including cell-free DNA, circulating-tumor DNA, Multiple Myeloma, diagnosis, genomic profiling, Minimal Residual Disease individually or in combination to shortlist the relevant studies.
resultcfDNA serves as a non-invasive source of tumor-specific molecular biomarker, ctDNA that has immense potential in facilitating management of cancer patients. The mutation detection platforms for ctDNA include hybrid capture and ultra-deep sequencing. Hybrid capture allows full length gene sequencing for mutation and CNV detection. The disease progression can be monitored by profiling prognostic somatic copy number alterations by ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing of ctDNA cost-effectively. Evolution of both the laboratory protocols and bioinformatics tools may further improve the sensitivity of ctDNA detection for better disease management. Only a limited number of studies were available in MM exploring the potential utility of cfDNA.
conclusionIn this review, we discuss the nuances and challenges associated with molecular evaluation of cfDNA and its potential role in diagnosis and monitoring of treatment response in MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32685257PMC7364270W3044303155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.