Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32685198›Full record

ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2020

Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meer Rabeel Zafar, Syed Farrukh Mustafa, Timothy W Miller, Talal Alkhawlani, Umesh C Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Valvular Heart Disease Associated With Radiation Therapy: A Contemporary Review.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. An overview of radiation-induced heart disease.Radiation oncology journal · 2022
    Article
  17. Mediastinal irradiation and valvular heart disease.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meer Rabeel ZafarDepartment of Medicine, Division Cardiology, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 7030, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA.
Syed Farrukh MustafaDepartment of Internal Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI USA.
Timothy W MillerDepartment of Medicine, Division Cardiology, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 7030, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA.
Talal AlkhawlaniDepartment of Medicine, Division Cardiology, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 7030, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA.
Umesh C SharmaDepartment of Medicine, Division Cardiology, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 7030, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0476-2523
Jacobs Institute · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · US

Funding

Institutional Career DevelopmentKL2TR001413 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DUBOCOVICH, MARGARITA L · 2015 to 2024
$4.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy (C-XRT) frequently present with aortic stenosis (AS) as the first manifestation of radiation-induced heart disease. They are considered high-risk for surgical valve replacement. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is as an attractive option for this patient population but the outcomes are not well established in major clinical trials. The authors performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies for the outcomes after TAVR in cancer survivors with prior C-XRT.

methodsOnline databases were searched from inception to April 2020 for studies evaluating the outcomes of TAVR in patients with and without C-XRT. We analyzed the pooled estimates (with their 95% confidence intervals) of the odds ratio (OR) for the all-cause mortality at 30-day and 1-year follow-ups, 4-point safety outcomes (stroke, major bleed, access-related vascular complications and need for a pacemaker), a 2-point efficacy outcome (mean aortic valve gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction) and worsening of congestive heart failure (CHF). Four studies were included following 2054 patients with and without prior C-XRT exposure (164 patients and 1890 patients respectively).

resultsThe C-XRT group had similar 30-day mortality compared to the control group (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.58,

conclusionTAVR in the C-XRT group has similar 30-day mortality, safety, and efficacy outcomes compared to the control group; however, they have higher 1-year mortality and CHF exacerbation. Including an oncologist to the cardiology team who considers cancer stage in the decision-making process and applying additional preoperative scores such as frailty indices may refine the risk assessment for these patients. The quality of analyzed data is modest, warranting randomized trials to assess the true benefits of TAVR in these patients.

Indexed as

Cancer SurviviorMeta-analysisRadiationTAVR

Identifiers

PMID32685198
PMCPMC7359474
OpenAlexW3043784659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.