ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2020
Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with radiation-induced aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Pooled it
- Association Between Previous or Active Cancer and Clinical Outcomes in TAVR Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 255,840 Patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Cancer Patients: A Contemporary Review of the Specific Challenges, the Outcomes, Risk Stratification, and Decision-Making.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Catheter-Based Valvular and Structural Interventions in Cancer Patients.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Imaging of the Acute and Chronic Cardiovascular Complications of Radiation Therapy.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- TAVR in cancer patients: outcomes in survivors with radiation and active cancer.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Outcomes of patients with active cancer after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated meta-analysis.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Aortic Valve Stenosis and Cancer: Problems of Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Valvular Heart Disease Associated With Radiation Therapy: A Contemporary Review.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2023Review
- Left atrial appendage volume as a prognostic Indicator of long-term mortality in Cancer survivors treated with thoracic radiation.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Radiation-Induced Aortic Stenosis: An Update on Treatment Modalities.JACC. Advances · 2023Review
- Cancer survivorship at heart: a multidisciplinary cardio-oncology roadmap for healthcare professionals.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- An overview of radiation-induced heart disease.Radiation oncology journal · 2022Article
- Mediastinal irradiation and valvular heart disease.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2022Review
- Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy (C-XRT) frequently present with aortic stenosis (AS) as the first manifestation of radiation-induced heart disease. They are considered high-risk for surgical valve replacement. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is as an attractive option for this patient population but the outcomes are not well established in major clinical trials. The authors performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies for the outcomes after TAVR in cancer survivors with prior C-XRT.
methodsOnline databases were searched from inception to April 2020 for studies evaluating the outcomes of TAVR in patients with and without C-XRT. We analyzed the pooled estimates (with their 95% confidence intervals) of the odds ratio (OR) for the all-cause mortality at 30-day and 1-year follow-ups, 4-point safety outcomes (stroke, major bleed, access-related vascular complications and need for a pacemaker), a 2-point efficacy outcome (mean aortic valve gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction) and worsening of congestive heart failure (CHF). Four studies were included following 2054 patients with and without prior C-XRT exposure (164 patients and 1890 patients respectively).
resultsThe C-XRT group had similar 30-day mortality compared to the control group (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.58,
conclusionTAVR in the C-XRT group has similar 30-day mortality, safety, and efficacy outcomes compared to the control group; however, they have higher 1-year mortality and CHF exacerbation. Including an oncologist to the cardiology team who considers cancer stage in the decision-making process and applying additional preoperative scores such as frailty indices may refine the risk assessment for these patients. The quality of analyzed data is modest, warranting randomized trials to assess the true benefits of TAVR in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.