ArticlePolish journal of radiology2020
Which is the most affected muscle in lumbar back pain - multifidus or erector spinae?
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Model for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation after Lumbar Discectomy.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal Dimension and Brightness Reference Values in Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging-A Radio-Anatomic Investigation in 80 Healthy Adult Individuals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Changes in Paraspinal Muscles and Facet Joints after Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique: A Prospective Study.Pain research & management · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between lumbar back pain, lumbar disc herniation, and erector spinae and multifidus muscle lipomatous degeneration. MATERIAL AND
methodsAfter receiving approval from the clinical studies Ethics Committee, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of patients who had physical examination in orthopaedic, neurology, neurosurgery, physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics were evaluated. Their pre-diagnoses were 'herniated nucleus pulposus' or 'lumbar disc herniation' or 'back pain' and their age range was between 18 and 64 years. Patients who had vertebral fracture, spondylitis-spondylodiscitis, tumours, structural anomalies such as spondylolisthesis, scoliosis and vertebral segmentation anomalies and previous surgery in the lumbar area were excluded. There were 205 patients in the case group who had lumbar disc herniation between L1-S1 level and there were 187 patients in the control group who had no lumbar disc herniation. In the study, patient age, sex, herniation level and erector spinae and multifidus muscle lipomatous degeneration were compared. Muscle lipomatous degeneration were evaluated with a visual scale.
resultsThere were 105 men and 100 women in the case group and 88 men and 99 women in the control group. In the case group, lumbar disc herniation was detected mostly at L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. There was no significant difference between case and control groups with regard to erector spinae and multifidus muscle lipomatous degeneration. In the case group, lipomatous degeneration of the erector spinae was higher compared to that of the multifidus muscle.
conclusionsPatients with low back pain may have fatty degeneration in erector spina and multifidus muscles with or without LDH, but LDH accelerates this process rather than being a result of it. In patients with LDH, fatty degeneration in the erector spina is more pronounced than in multifidus, and the erector spina is more affected by the LDH process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.