Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32684959›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2020

Evolution of self-incompatibility in the Brassicaceae: Lessons from a textbook example of natural selection.

Eléonore Durand, Maxime Chantreau, Audrey Le Veve, Roman Stetsenko, Manu Dubin, Mathieu Genete, Violaine Llaurens, Céline Poux, Camille Roux, Sylvain Billiard and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eléonore DurandCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0912-9252
Maxime ChantreauCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2844-1989
Audrey Le VeveCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5895-370X
Roman StetsenkoCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-9615
Manu DubinCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-2456
Mathieu GeneteCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-8793
Violaine LlaurensInstitut de Systématique, Evolution et Biodiversité (ISYEB) Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles CP 50 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1962-7391
Céline PouxCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9379-2769
Camille RouxCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3101-3977
Sylvain BilliardCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2135-3246
Xavier VekemansCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4836-4394
Vincent CastricCNRS Univ. Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo F-59000 Lille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4461-4915
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-incompatibility (SI) is a self-recognition genetic system enforcing outcrossing in hermaphroditic flowering plants and results in one of the arguably best understood forms of natural (balancing) selection maintaining genetic variation over long evolutionary times. A rich theoretical and empirical population genetics literature has considerably clarified how the distribution of SI phenotypes translates into fitness differences among individuals by a combination of inbreeding avoidance and rare-allele advantage. At the same time, the molecular mechanisms by which self-pollen is specifically recognized and rejected have been described in exquisite details in several model organisms, such that the genotype-to-phenotype map is also pretty well understood, notably in the Brassicaceae. Here, we review recent advances in these two fronts and illustrate how the joint availability of detailed characterization of genotype-to-phenotype and phenotype-to-fitness maps on a single genetic system (plant self-incompatibility) provides the opportunity to understand the evolutionary process in a unique perspective, bringing novel insight on general questions about the emergence, maintenance, and diversification of a complex genetic system.

Indexed as

allelic diversificationbalancing selectiondominance/recessivity interactionsplant mating systemssexual reproduction

Identifiers

PMID32684959
PMCPMC7359833
OpenAlexW3006214574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.